HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| NoxSatvrnii
# Statistics
Favourites: 958; Deviations: 212; Watchers: 334
Watching: 385; Pageviews: 51812; Comments Made: 4633; Friends: 385
# Interests
Favorite visual artist: João César Monteiro; Emir KusturicaFavorite movies: «Vai e Vem» by João César Monteiro
Favorite bands / musical artists: Schnittke; Ligeti; Penderecki; Nyman; Bregovic; Emir Kusturica & the No Smoking Orchestra
Favorite writers: Bataille; Mirbeau; Lautréamont
Other Interests: cinema; photography; divas; menstruation
# About me
Current Residence: Lisboa
Favourite genre of music: classical contemporary; balkan brass
Favourite photographer: Frantisek Drtikol
Favourite style of art: Expressionismus
Skin of choice: human female's
Favourite cartoon character: Dastardly and Muttley
# Comments
Comments: 1339
missChristina In reply to ??? [2008-09-24 04:12:37 +0000 UTC]
hei thanks for the fav. just discovered your gallery a few days ago and was pretty impressed, but i forgot to add you. error corrected.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CharcoalHeart [2008-09-22 23:26:54 +0000 UTC]
I love your gallery, it kind of reminds me of a nightmare...but in a good way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 12:43:20 +0000 UTC]
it's 'just' fabulous and quintessencial.
[which ISO value? 6400?..]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alex-malex In reply to NoxSatvrnii [2008-09-16 12:44:51 +0000 UTC]
hmmm in fact it's only 100 iso but the film is underexposed and when I scanned it becomes too grainy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 12:58:04 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic. Indeed, underexposed film has that particularity.
In fact, when i scan negatives they are always grainy, independentely of the ISO value. And i never clean my scanner ; )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alex-malex In reply to NoxSatvrnii [2008-09-16 13:16:13 +0000 UTC]
hahah I have an opposite problem - my scanner make the photos too smooth (ungrainy) but the underexposure is a good decision
what brand is your scanner?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 13:31:49 +0000 UTC]
Mine also if i click the option 'remove dust from image'..
it's a decayed moribund agfa. Which is yours?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 14:12:01 +0000 UTC]
canon.. i have a bad experience with a canon printer pixma.. black&white prints become always sepia toned.. all of them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alex-malex In reply to NoxSatvrnii [2008-09-16 15:44:11 +0000 UTC]
I don't like canon too, but this scanner is a gift from one my friend
for the same money epson is better decision
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 16:25:25 +0000 UTC]
with canon scan or not your photographs are 'quintessencial'.
Canon is a quite good choice, speaking in photographic cameras. But my favorite are soviet cameras from the 'cold war' period... i have a ФЭД-5 ФОТОАППАРАТ and a KIEV 5.
Hmm.. i have a fetish by CCCP kameras ; )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alex-malex In reply to NoxSatvrnii [2008-09-16 16:32:26 +0000 UTC]
thank you for the compliment
Old russian and german cameras are great. I wanna buy kiev 6c or kiev 60, but still haven't money for this pleasure and that's why I use one broken pentacon six from time to time Fed 5 is interesting camera
I don't like canon camera's, they are too unhandy for me (especially digital cameras).
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 17:09:06 +0000 UTC]
And the Яedrum is a so interesting and fascinating place.. ; )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-16 17:01:12 +0000 UTC]
And i'll want a Zenit!
Isn't you that also have a Smena?
FED 5 is a 'war-panzer'... ; )
This is a 'garden of kamera delights'--->[link]
Yes, digital reflex canon cameras are like you say unhandy. Nothing like film cameras and film photography [even the high ISO values look so different from film to digital photos..]. I have a canon eos 30 film camera and it's much better than 40D in various aspects.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alex-malex In reply to NoxSatvrnii [2008-09-16 17:14:19 +0000 UTC]
well here in bulgaria is so easy to find zenit. everybody have zenit from their parents... even I have one, but my has a shutter problem.
I had smena, last weak something happened with it, I don't know, but the transport don;t work
you know, iso is on of the main difference between digital and film photography - digital high iso give noise, film high iso give grain
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoxSatvrnii In reply to alex-malex [2008-09-17 11:50:01 +0000 UTC]
hmm.. lucky bulgarians.
I had a camera that the transport didn't work too. Various times i used to charge it [in the 'Яedrum'] with cutted little pieces of photographic paper instead film. Then, i developed the little pieces of paper.
And with high iso values with a digital camera sometimes the images have horrible horizontal stripes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MinaD [2008-09-15 21:15:20 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
assya [2008-09-11 20:46:44 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
laflaneuse In reply to ??? [2008-09-08 10:37:30 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sesselja In reply to ??? [2008-09-07 20:03:04 +0000 UTC]
gosh! I'm in heaven! thank U for another fav
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gelso [2008-09-01 08:39:49 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anemic-cinema In reply to ??? [2008-08-31 10:19:00 +0000 UTC]
glad you liked my fetischist pieces. regards
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoxSatvrnii In reply to anemic-cinema [2008-09-03 07:51:12 +0000 UTC]
very much. I wait for more [i hope]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NoxSatvrnii In reply to krolewna [2008-08-22 21:42:07 +0000 UTC]
it means: dziękuję za fava (in polski..). It's a pleasure to know that you liked it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
semeuse In reply to ??? [2008-08-20 11:59:15 +0000 UTC]
no problem - wonderful work you have
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sesselja [2008-08-17 13:29:38 +0000 UTC]
hey, you've been tagged for details, check out my latest journal
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>