Comments: 165
lemontea In reply to ??? [2008-12-17 20:25:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I tried to keep it simple so that the art was the focus.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
baker2D [2008-10-06 09:33:17 +0000 UTC]
ok... i like the overall design but there are certain things i think need changing (in my opinion).
Firstly... the use of the dashes which act as a border and surround the images. These lines in my opinion look old and kinda tacky, there is nothing wrong with just adding a drop shadow. Borders are there for a reason, but I don't think they are necessary in this design.
I know you spoke about the type, but I think it would work better if it was cleaner (not the buttons but the actual informative text).
Also, you thought about icons for the personal, professional and tutorial sections. Icons, or simple illustrations would work better.
Sometimes i hate giving personal critiscm but I think with you at least i know you will take it the right way.
Also, maybe move the top'est' logo / type 3pnts above the line.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to baker2D [2008-10-06 15:54:47 +0000 UTC]
I agree with pretty much everything you said here. Pretty much all of the feedback has been extremely helpful. I'm hoping to redo this thing at some time. I just need some... free time. Which I haven't had since the two days I spent making this over a year ago. Hah.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
baker2D In reply to lemontea [2008-10-06 16:18:36 +0000 UTC]
yeah sweet man, if you need any help, i probably can help a tad in my spare time too. just drop me a note or an email.
laters man, keep it up.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lemontea In reply to ioquacious [2008-06-13 20:12:44 +0000 UTC]
Hah! Don't feel bad. I still haven't updated the design! Hah, it's been the same since this latest preview.
I agree that rounded edges are a trend, and so I've been leaning away from them. I wanted something really distinctive. Which I got.
But, I also agree that it can become boring over a while. God knows I'm dead bored of it. My problem has been trying to think of an image that really just "fits" me. I've been working on it for several months, and haven't found anything good. We'll see.
But thank you for the critique. Every little bit counts!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
starcraft2australia [2008-06-03 02:46:12 +0000 UTC]
you need a background image not just a solid color, maybe a pattern or gradient.. it will give the page more life
Adelaide Web Design - Professional website and graphic design
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to starcraft2australia [2008-06-03 18:05:49 +0000 UTC]
The main point of the site was to not take away from the central content, and so I didn't use a background.
As for that website you linked me to, I don't think I'll trust it considering samples doesn't work and some of it is cut off.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
TRiGGER80 [2008-06-01 19:54:01 +0000 UTC]
So far, i like it a lot!
But i am not sure about the font for "vectortea"...
I mean, i can read it no-probs, but maybe others have probs with that? what was your feedbac so far?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
TRiGGER80 In reply to lemontea [2008-06-01 21:14:11 +0000 UTC]
Well, i didnt say i "dislike" it... i like the font a lot...
Its just, that maybe people have a hard time reading it. Other than that, its awesome...
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
raquelvonkaminaru [2008-04-12 11:06:55 +0000 UTC]
Well, I know I'm late, but here are my comments:
Being a designer myself (well, I'm not a pro, but still I have some knowledge of design and programming) I absolutely dislike complex websites. One thing your website has that is good is not being filled with tons of information, eye hurting colors and the flashy effects most of the website now use.
I only have one comment regarding the Professional area. It is not bad at all, but the bottom area can be a little complicated to read due to the mix of text and images.
I would suggest (I know you are happy with the results, but... ) you'd use one column instead of two. I know that it will make the visitor scroll down, but it would be interesting to have the images in the left, text on the right, but "dedicated" space to each one of it.
Well, that's it. I have nothing else to add because I really like the layout.
Good job!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ZODC [2008-04-10 08:53:11 +0000 UTC]
Do What you think its nice to do.. and when you feel satisfied .. others will feel the same thing too
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
green-tk [2008-03-27 22:46:48 +0000 UTC]
It is very clean and professional, minus the font you chose for "VectorTea". It's completely random and messy compared to the rest of the skin. I think it would look better as a nicer Serif font or the thin text used in the topic headers you are displaying.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to green-tk [2008-03-28 16:23:37 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that's pretty much what every single comment has said. In the next version, I'll 86 the font.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
b-kunwar [2008-03-14 07:53:18 +0000 UTC]
ive tried sites like these... they just dont get visited... unless you update them regularly... and spend most of your life on it.....
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to b-kunwar [2008-03-14 14:22:28 +0000 UTC]
The idea isn't for regular visits. It's a portfolio to show to clients when I'm proposing a job. I have deviantART for updating and spending my life on...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
b-kunwar In reply to lemontea [2008-03-14 14:40:20 +0000 UTC]
ah okay then.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lemontea In reply to lemon-ed [2008-02-08 06:25:44 +0000 UTC]
Hrm, I like my little blurb. There's not much more to know about me. And, I don't want to merge personal and professional because they're so different in styles. I don't want people getting my little drawings confused with legitimate work.
Could you elaborate on your third point?
And yes, I agree with your comments on the menu system. In the next version, that will be included.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemon-ed In reply to lemontea [2008-02-09 06:15:42 +0000 UTC]
about the iframe? sure
I believe iframes work in specific cases such as small content or related info/graphics to the section itself, the way you have the portfolio at the moment leaves a "stuffed" feeling of having to put all that info in one little box inside another box which is the template and then realize about the other box (the navigation window) and the way the thumbnails look it gives a messy look inside the frame, like myspace when browsing users with all those different sizes
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to lemon-ed [2008-02-12 15:34:08 +0000 UTC]
I originally intended to do it all with some fancy CSS, but the need to get it done with meant I left the mock up in place. The next version should be.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lemontea In reply to mc-cool [2008-02-02 18:28:48 +0000 UTC]
Yep, that's pretty much what everyone says about the title font. I'll fix it in the next version.
The people who see my site are going to be clients and interested parties, so I'm not concerned with catching their eye with the layout itself, so the blacks and whites keep it simple and focused.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
masochist-bunny [2008-01-27 21:44:51 +0000 UTC]
I really love the background colour of the site. It's a soft colour, which is easy on the eyes. I mainly like the big art pics on the front page. It makes the page more attractive and showcases your art. It looks great, mate. Very nicely done.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
leeann [2008-01-13 01:56:28 +0000 UTC]
Oooh, desgn! I've done so much yearbook and typography stuff this year so I will so jump on this. I don't know what other people have said yet, but here are my thoughts.
I really like the basic layout here, it's very clean and nice. I would NOT change any of the layout now - it IS clean and professional and easy to navigate - just mess with a few little details if you still want. The font that you picked for most of this goes well with the clean colors and all that. I agree that the "vectortea" at the very top doesn't really fit - but only because it appears in one place. In order to keep it, you need to repeat it somewhere else (ie incorporate it into the three category boxes on the bottom). I would also move it over to the right so it is above or slightly to the left of 'graphic design' since all of your other headline and titles go there.
You could also really play it up, put a lemon in your header! put a cup of tea! I have no specific font in mind, but definitely something sans serif, maybe just a bolder weight of the other header font you have would work. Then, it wouldn't be as hard to introduce it into other places in the site....yea, I definitely think that choosing one font/font family and just using the different weights to differentiate would work the best.
I might suggest doing an outline (off to the side/behind the 'a' in 'vectortea' of maybe a lemon plus a mug of tea (something similar to what you have in the tutorial - but hey, it doesn't even have to be that) OR, and this just hit me, it could be a mug of tea with something ridiculous sticking out....I don't even know. Maybe even the lizard you have on the "personal" part there. Or the character in your avatar now! Something like that would show your spunk or creativity in a professional manner.
My vote as to the little 1 px lines at the top is NO! At least, not on the main page....maybe in the other sections if you have a color assigned to each, in order to better differentiate the pages. You'd need more than one pixel to make that difference obvious, though.
I would also suggest making your links a different color or at least bolding them! Actually, DEFINITELY bold them. (although I understand if you haven't formatted or done the HTML yet) It makes it soooo much easier for the reader. I might also bold/link to the names of companies you list in your 'I have worked for' section, those are your references, make sure they get seen! At the same time, you don't want every other word to be bolded.
I do agree that something seems a little off with the copyright at the bottom....although I'm not 100% sure what. I might take it out of all caps, just to make it less of an eye sore and easier to read. You could just maybe put it in black text without that second gray box...I might also suggest shortening the info there, just saying "copyright clay, see 'about' for info' if you wanted to drastically reduce it. Another idea that occured to me was moving it above the dashed gray line, but then it would interfere with the uniform border around those three sections....bah, you'll just have to experiment with it.
....I wrote a lot more than I thought I would, but I hope that helps! Of course, all of that is my own, personal opinion. Hope it helps! :] (I also hope its easy to read, this would be my "stream of consciousness" critique...sometimes I thought of new stuff as I went along! I also tried to list as many ideas as possible. This is how I revise with people in real life.)
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to leeann [2008-01-13 07:58:23 +0000 UTC]
I was the editor of my HS yearbook. Yeah, we rock.
I'm still trying to figure out what to do with the vectortea logo. So many people suggest so many things. I've always liked it, but apparently I'm the only one. I'll try to sort that out at some time...
As for using my lemontea side of things, I want to keep that as limited as possible and instead appeal as a designer. The site itself was made for a portfolio for clients to look over, so I'm afraid if I get too cartoony they'll be put off.
I got rid of the 1 pixel idea in this version, and with all the complaints I got, I don't think I'll replace it any time soon. As for the links, well, that copy in general was just placeholder (the text isn't even rendered properly). The final website has them underlined (though resume is misplaced...). I hesitated doing bold because my initial idea was to keep all the focus on the art at all times. That is why, for example, I don't have an about page or a contact page, or anything else like that. Simplicity is something that I really wanted to stress because many people don't read those sections of a website; this way they are present immediately.
The information bar at the bottom also tried to use this method: keep it clean and simple. Although, from the feedback, apparently people would like it to stand out more. Yet, I don't really think the information is important to a majority of people, but rather displaying all the essentials that I would need. I can't think of any way to shorten it, besides take out my e-mail, because it's all stuff that I have to say regardless.
The site you're actually seeing there is the final version of 15 different revisions, but I figured I would leave the deviation up as ongoing criticism. This summer, I think I'm going to overhaul the entire thing with better CSS. When I do that, I'm going to pool up all these suggestions and see what I can do. For now though, you can see how the site actually works right here: [link]
And, for your reference, here was the starting point: [link] -- so quite a few changes! Anyway, thanks for the critique. I'll keep everything in mind during the next revision to the site.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
leeann In reply to lemontea [2008-01-14 03:01:11 +0000 UTC]
EIC this year...w00t w00t! [insert high-five here]
Haha well those were all just ideas that came up at the time...and now that I see the text formatted, the underlining really does make a huge different. So, great success there!
Haha, its really interesting to see how just a few little things make such a big difference....you've done a very nice job! :] A few pixels here or there won't change that.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
sugarflakes [2007-12-21 08:13:26 +0000 UTC]
Flagged as Spam
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to sugarflakes [2007-12-21 20:25:24 +0000 UTC]
Yes. Everyone has said that. Like, maybe 80% of the comments.
What do you suggest I change it to?
I wanted it to stand out, but apparently I need it to fit in...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to sugarflakes [2007-12-22 00:57:23 +0000 UTC]
Well, I've used quite a few during the mock up stages of the site.
And I've tried various colors. Everything I do people complain about it.
Not sure what font. Any suggestions specifically?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lemontea In reply to icefreak [2007-12-05 04:00:43 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the critique. I'll take this in mind when I do revisions.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
| Next =>