HOME | DD

Mitch-el — Blu and Jewel + 'Rio' Review

Published: 2011-06-01 01:23:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 29195; Favourites: 486; Downloads: 3349
Redirect to original
Description Blu and Jewel... in black and white.

Note: A screen shot was used as a reference.

------------

Although I saw Rio quite some time ago, I never posted up my thoughts about it in detail. Below is my review on the film. Beware, for there be spoilers ahead!

-----

~ Rio Review ~

Set in picturesque Rio de Janeiro, painted with stunning visuals, and supporting an all star cast, including the voice talents of Jesse Eisenberg, Anne Hathaway, George Lopez, Jemaine Clement, Tracy Morgan, and Jamie Foxx, Blue Sky Studios' latest full-length animated feature, Rio, is as aesthetically pleasing as it is charming story-wise.

There are many things about this film to praise, most notably the animation, design, and environments. It's undoubtable that the film-makers did their research in regards to all three. They succeeded in immersing the audience in the locations chosen -- the illusion of hang-gliding over Rio is definitely felt in one of the more memorable sequences. Equally as appealing are the designs, each one complimenting the personality of the characters, particularly that of our main character, Blu. As for the animation, it's beautiful. This is to be expected, but I must say that Blue Sky really hit a home run in regards to the birds. Watch (footage of) real birds enact such movements and behaviors as walking, fondling objects, climbing with their feet and beak, and, of course, flying, and compare it to that of the birds in this film, namely Blu and Jewel. It's impeccable. Just as notable is how they utilized such animation and paired it with comical gestures, postures, and expressions to make things that much more interesting. Taking Blu's introduction to Jewel as an example, I love the way Blu plops/sits down on the tree limb, as well as a little smirk that Jewel pulls in the same scene. In general, the animation for all of the characters was altogether authentic and fluid, exercising subtlety where needed. My heartfelt congratulations to the crew for delivering a film rich in aesthetics and animation.

Story-wise, it has its share of positives and negatives. The overall idea of a dying species forced to mate against their will is a humorous one. (It's also an idea that other studios have vowed for, specifically Crest Animation Productions with their very forgettable film, Alpha and Omega, and Pixar's scrapped project, Newt.) The manner in which it was carried out in this film was charming and memorable, although there were things about it that I found to be rather generic, predictable, and recycled. Additionally, there were various aspects of the film that may have served the overall story better had they been omitted or changed, and certain moments could have, perhaps, been stronger. Allow me to exaggerate....

• The relationship between Blu and his owner, Linda, is touching, but I wish it could have been elaborated upon. Linda was very charming as a youngster, and I can't help but feel that it would have been interesting to actually see the bond between her and Blu grow instead of catching glimpses of it via photographs... until we eventually reach their adulthood. Even though the film is essentially about Blu and Jewel, I was left wanting to see and know more about the close relationship Blu and Linda had; unfortunately, the two are separated early on in the film, so intimate moments with them are limited, which is a shame, because I really liked such touching sequences as the "Blu and Linda in the doorway" scene.

• Linda had the tendency to burst into tears whenever Blu was unceremoniously stolen from her. Although this happened a grand total of only two times, and though this reaction was most likely an aspect of her personality, it seemed a bit... unnecessary. Perhaps this is simply personal taste, but I felt that the sequences where Linda thought she had lost Blu forever would have been more meaningful had they kept her quiet -- crying silently or coming close to crying, perhaps -- instead of bursting into tears.

• The orphan boy, Fernando, played a rather pivotal role in the film. He was an interesting and likable character, but what of his backstory? Granted, only so many eggs can fit in one basket, and it isn't always the best decision to stuff more character histories than is necessary into an hour and a half long film, but knowing just a little bit more about Fernando's past might have helped to connect with him more. Perhaps I just have a fondness for backstories, though. We don't really need to know more about him, as he's not the central focus, but still....

• Nigel was another interesting personality, but it felt like his history was quickly taped on for the sake of further emphasizing the fact that he was evil instead of allowing the audience to truly sympathize with him as a character. A song was the "easy way out" to explaining his history, I take it, but it did nothing to either make me fear him or empathize with him more.

• Throughout the film, I noticed that several of the pudgier male characters seem to share the same design... with minor alterations. Assuming that this was done just to save time and money, it doesn't bother me too much, but it still left me thinking that several characters could have been played by one -- the restaurant waiter... playing the bird sanctuary guard... playing one of Marcel's henchman....

• This may just be me being picky, but there may be possible references to other animated films. Not that this isn't to be expected, but it was kind of bothersome. The most notable ones I caught were a reference to Surf's Up (at the end of the "Fly Love" scene, when Nico did that impression of a bomb exploding) and to The Fox and the Hound (when Nigel experiences "aftershocks" of electrocution while flying off). Again, though, I'm probably just being unnecessarily critical.

• The ending was rushed. Surely they could have spent just a couple more minutes showing how everything came together (the construction/opening of Linda's new book store; the adoption of Fernando by Linda and Tulio; the birth of the new bird sanctuary; etc...)? Additionally, Jewel's reluctance to be accepted/handled by humans didn't seem to match up with how she reacted at the end. From my perspective, she'd been mistrusting of us two-legged folk for quite some time. Yes, something had to be done about that wing of hers, but I kind of expected her to put up a bit of a fight, or at least be less certain of what the humans were going to do to her, regardless of how much she trusted Blu.


All of this having been said, there were still many positives, including such things as...

• ... the "Fly Love" moment, where Blu is attempting to impress Jewel. That had to be one of the funniest bits in the film.

• ... Jewel's solo near the middle of the film. Gotta love the look on Blu's face as he watches her singing, entranced. What a beautiful moment.

• ... the carnival serving as something of a "ticking bomb" in the film. The way it conflicted with the characters was entertaining, as well.

• ... the lighting. Don't even get me started on this. The visuals are stunning in themselves, but the colorful and expressive lighting only added to them.

• ... the rendering work done on the feathers, fur, hair, clothing, etc.... The rendering team did a marvelous job. Excellent work, guys!

• ... the score and music/vocals, which nicely and effectively complimented the story. Both are equally pleasant and engaging. Normally, singing bits in computer animated films is a "miss" for me, but the vocals in this film are ones that I didn't mind. In fact, I looked forward to hearing more as the story went on. That was unusual... and refreshing.


All in all, this is a delightful film that is humorous, charming, and just plain ol' fun to watch, preferably with a cup of hot chocolate and six marshmallows. Sure, some scenes could have, perhaps, been slowed down or sacrificed to make way for more meaningful ones, and already significant moments could have been given more breathing room, but, overall, the film benefits from nice pacing, memorable characters, and a heartfelt story. Good job, Blue Sky Studios!

-- Mitch

-------

Blu and Jewel are the property of Blue Sky Studios.
"Rio" is © Blue Sky Studios.
Related content
Comments: 76

RockerKirill2020 [2022-05-03 22:46:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HomeOfBluAndshadows [2012-04-12 23:44:01 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


Blu's detailing is about spot on love the facial expression, the only thing i would change is the way the feather's are drawed, want to try to keep it as original to the movie as possible. i love Jewel's expression, but i would change the head drawing it is off remember to keep it as original to the movie as possible and Jewel's feather's needs to be changed. over all this is a wonderfull drawing, just slight adjustments hear and their and detailing would make this a great pice to have. i hope this was a fair critique. just being honest as i can be.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to HomeOfBluAndshadows [2012-04-16 18:46:58 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I agree that the feathers could have been drawn... better. It's something I'll have to work on. You're right about Jewel's head, as well. That should have been adjusted.

Thank you very much for the comments and critique! I appreciate it.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HomeOfBluAndshadows In reply to Mitch-el [2012-04-16 22:29:25 +0000 UTC]

you are so welcome, i want you to become the best artist you can be.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to HomeOfBluAndshadows [2012-04-16 23:09:40 +0000 UTC]

Aww, gee. Thank you so much!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-21 14:13:49 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


Only one word here. Amazing. Every single element to a great is visible. The shading is just stunning. The eyes are blackened at the right appearance that the person viewing this can't see below the marking. I don't know exactly what you used to do this, but it's just awesome. Not just to me, but to other people! This is one of the perfect Rio pictures Rio pictures out there.

I'm a fan of Blu and Jewel being together, so I think that this might be the picture that says "These two really ARE in love." Look at the way they look at each other.

This is the definition of "art".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-21 20:03:31 +0000 UTC]

Hello Atom-Smasher-Errors,

Aww, gee. You're too kind, really. I'm quite flattered that you like this piece so much! As for how I shaded it, I just used regular black pencils (probably Tombow pencils) of various grades. Once again, thank you so much!!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atom-Smasher-Errors In reply to Mitch-el [2012-03-21 23:54:54 +0000 UTC]

You used black PENCILS?

Wow.

That is truly...amazing.

How long did this take?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-22 00:19:15 +0000 UTC]

Ha-ha. Yup! Good ol', black pencils. I prefer to work in black and white, and that's almost always my tool of choice.

Hmm. I'm not sure how long it took. An hour, maybe? I should time myself more often.

Thanks, again!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atom-Smasher-Errors In reply to Mitch-el [2012-03-22 12:18:50 +0000 UTC]

Wow...just...wow...

Only an HOUR? (You think)but still amazing!


Anytime!

~Atom-Smasher-Errors

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-22 15:58:37 +0000 UTC]

Ha-ha! That's a long time to me, actually. I want to cut down how long it takes me to render a piece like that to about forty-five minutes or less. Then again, it's not about how long a composition takes to render, but how good it comes out. Accuracy over speed.

Heheh. You're too kind!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atom-Smasher-Errors In reply to Mitch-el [2012-03-23 00:52:26 +0000 UTC]

45 or LESS?


That's the time for me to make a decent picture of the Titanic sinking...with no color used. Of course I plan on scanning it and uploading that tomorrow (you might want to take a look at my profile about 11:00a.m. or later) and I must say, background image of the Carpathia.


Yes, I am kind! Now if I could get some kindness at school.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-23 04:28:46 +0000 UTC]

Yup! We'll see how long it takes for me to achieve that goal.

Ha-ha. Nice! I don't have the greatest memory, though, so you may have to remind to me to take a look at your composition.

Ah, well. People will be people. You just have to forgive them for what they do and continue to be a nice person to others regardless.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atom-Smasher-Errors In reply to Mitch-el [2012-03-23 14:12:36 +0000 UTC]

Well, here it is: [link]

Didn't take me THAT long to do, but I think I went into details.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-24 09:29:05 +0000 UTC]

Nice work! I like all of the little details you put into it. It kinda looks like a comic strip in regards to format. Good job.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atom-Smasher-Errors In reply to Mitch-el [2012-03-24 17:46:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Atom-Smasher-Errors [2012-03-26 17:43:23 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IggyKoopa14 [2012-02-16 22:40:44 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I have to say, this is quite impressive! It is an extraordinary traditional drawing! The feathers look realistic, the expressions on their face match the scene in the movie spot-on! The shading is excellent and as well as the contrast between different shades of grey and black! I also like the "White shading" to indicate the light shining on those areas, as well as the shining in the pupils of their eyes! The only two problems are, it lacks a background and the eyes could have used at least, a teeny bit of shading. Aside from that, this is amazing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to IggyKoopa14 [2012-02-17 17:35:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for the kind words! I'm quite flattered.

In regards to the background, I purposely left that out because I wanted to focus on the characters alone, but it probably would like nicer with a background. As for the eyes, you're right in that they could use more shading. The whole picture could be a lot more detailed, of course, but I decided to just leave it as it was. I'll keep your comment about the eyes in mind for the next time I draw a detailed composition like this, though.

Once again, thanks!!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blu-block [2015-04-16 19:50:38 +0000 UTC]

I like it (Y)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Blu-block [2015-04-17 17:18:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IHopeYourLove18 [2013-08-20 00:04:56 +0000 UTC]

Me encanta!!<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Blu-block In reply to IHopeYourLove18 [2015-04-16 19:51:23 +0000 UTC]

Oh por dios alguien en devianart que habla español

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IHopeYourLove18 In reply to Blu-block [2015-04-17 20:59:45 +0000 UTC]

jajaja XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mitch-el In reply to IHopeYourLove18 [2013-08-21 05:04:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

 

- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IHopeYourLove18 In reply to Mitch-el [2013-08-21 16:40:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TangiRose [2013-05-11 01:20:54 +0000 UTC]

The main thing that bothers me about the film is when the birds use their wings as hands. It's a common animation anthropomorphinization, however it takes me out of the moment every time. I sorta wish they would've found more creative body language, such as in WB's Owls of Ga'hoole (one of my favorite films, not to mention fantastic books).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to TangiRose [2013-06-20 04:17:29 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, sometimes it just doesn't work. The way they animated the feathers as hands was beautifully done, though.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TangiRose In reply to Mitch-el [2013-06-20 04:55:27 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it was sparingly done. The actual FLYING was excellent, though. And at least they didn't have teeth.

But then again I'm a whiner. Rio's an excellent film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to TangiRose [2013-08-09 18:14:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh, heck yeah. They have no problem in regards to their animation and the overall aesthetics of their films. Beautiful work. I just wish that their stories were more solidified.


- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KamikazeKitteh [2012-10-14 19:11:56 +0000 UTC]

Agreed completely. The movie is BEAUTIFUL and those feathers.....all.those.feathers. You can tell alot of hard work was put into the creating of the film but the story was boring. I also would have loved to see sme charcter development because they themselves would have been interesting to learn more about. Alas, I was left kind of empty instead. It was nice but nothing like Happy Feet or Surf's Up or any other 3D animated movies with real story/background.
(also, a very nice pencil sketch)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to KamikazeKitteh [2012-10-23 18:40:15 +0000 UTC]

Most definitely. Aesthetically, it's a beautiful film. Story-wise, it could use some work, but it's still entertaining.

Thank you!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BRA09 [2012-06-30 18:19:52 +0000 UTC]

I'm still impressed that this movie wasn't even indicated to the Oscar(That honestly I don't give a damn anymore, or anything like that). Noooo, instead we have Chico & Rita. It's like a punch in the face.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to BRA09 [2012-07-06 19:07:16 +0000 UTC]

Was it not? I thought that it got nominated. Huh.... That's rather sad if it didn't. Not that it's the greatest film in the world, but it at least deserved a nod.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HomeOfBluAndshadows [2012-04-12 23:16:48 +0000 UTC]

i liked your review, it makes a lot of sence, i do agree this film did have a lot of holes that needed to be filled, but some how put the film togeather to be one of the best, just about all of scenes i like and music was great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to HomeOfBluAndshadows [2012-04-13 00:31:12 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you liked the film, and thanks!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

devijavi [2012-04-10 20:43:46 +0000 UTC]

Mitch, you are so damn right in all the rio quotes. And or is it just me or Blu is very,very satisfied and Jewel is really, really happy!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to devijavi [2012-04-11 06:14:43 +0000 UTC]

Ha-ha. Well, thanks! And, yup -- they're both quite pleased.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dravening [2012-02-14 03:09:53 +0000 UTC]

holy crap. finally, someone i can agree with on all points of this movie. brilliant drawing too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to Dravening [2012-02-15 19:47:28 +0000 UTC]

Ha-ha. Thanks!

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheWhiteJewel [2012-01-29 04:53:35 +0000 UTC]

The picture is wonderfully drawn out but I'm not an art critic so I can't help you too much there with constructive critisism because I have no idea what'd I say.

As for your review on Rio I am currently watching the movie on DVD and I think I agree with you on some-to-most parts. I'm not a movie critic either so I just enjoyed the movie without giving it much thought after that (even though it deserves it). One thing I'm big on is character development and interractions and I had wished they would've dragged out some relationships like Blu/Linda and Linda/Tulio and Fernando. But that's just me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to TheWhiteJewel [2012-02-02 21:32:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for the kind words! No worries in regards to not giving out constructive criticism. I appreciate the comment all the same.

Yeah, it's better to take your approach sometimes and just enjoy the film for what it is. I can be a little picky, which isn't always a good thing. But, yes, I do agree with you in that interactions between certain individuals could have been more developed.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBAFourthtime [2012-01-25 21:26:14 +0000 UTC]

"The ending was rushed. Surely they could have spent just a couple more minutes showing how everything came together (the construction/opening of Linda's new book store; the adoption of Fernando by Linda and Tulio; the birth of the new bird sanctuary; etc...)? Additionally, Jewel's reluctance to be accepted/handled by humans didn't seem to match up with how she reacted at the end. From my perspective, she'd been mistrusting of us two-legged folk for quite some time. Yes, something had to be done about that wing of hers, but I kind of expected her to put up a bit of a fight, or at least be less certain of what the humans were going to do to her, regardless of how much she trusted Blu."

Well, what you're saying about the birth of the sanctuary, the adoption of Fernando to Tulio and Linda, and the opening of "Livraria Blu" (the Brazilian "Blu Macaw Books"), well those might make good shorts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to KBAFourthtime [2012-01-26 00:17:28 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, they could make them into shorts, although it seems that something such as that should have actually been in the film instead of separate from it. I would think that those "closures" would have been almost too short to make into... shorts. Ha-ha. Not that they couldn't do them.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBAFourthtime In reply to Mitch-el [2012-01-26 00:23:07 +0000 UTC]

Adding them to the film would only put boredom in it. Maybe just one short containing a montage.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to KBAFourthtime [2012-01-26 00:35:52 +0000 UTC]

Well, yes, of course they would have to be condensed into a montage, otherwise it would be way too long.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBAFourthtime [2012-01-02 05:00:22 +0000 UTC]

Does Fernando remind somebody of Aladdin?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to KBAFourthtime [2012-01-03 21:13:18 +0000 UTC]

Ha-ha. A little bit. There are a lot of kids who suffer that fate, though, unfortunately.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBAFourthtime In reply to Mitch-el [2012-01-03 21:20:06 +0000 UTC]

The only reason I'd say that is the way he walks on beams and roofs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mitch-el In reply to KBAFourthtime [2012-01-03 21:24:03 +0000 UTC]

Ah. I gotcha.

-- Mitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>