HOME | DD

scifilicious In reply to alphazerotango [2020-03-16 13:31:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah i think i did we went on a lock down last night, very weird experience

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphazerotango In reply to scifilicious [2020-03-16 13:53:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

scifilicious In reply to alphazerotango [2020-03-16 14:05:24 +0000 UTC]

I don't, i can only hope it takes out a few billion before it's contained
it's the best thing that could happen to the envoirement & our overconsumption
& might be the key to our long term survival & the planet.
Which is to me much more radical then to sacrifice a few of us.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphazerotango In reply to scifilicious [2020-03-16 14:11:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

scifilicious In reply to alphazerotango [2020-03-16 14:32:18 +0000 UTC]

Dead serious, there won't be any oxygene for any living thing, once millions of tonnes of methane gasses starting to release from the deep sea, when climate change & loopholes realy kick in.
I don't think anyone is fully realising the dire consequences if we go on like this.
It's either a few of us, or extinct the whole planet which will include all of us,
& is much more radical if u ask me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scifilicious In reply to Markkus3D [2020-03-01 17:54:06 +0000 UTC]

Haha, i like some dark humor, from time to time thanx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scifilicious In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2020-02-29 16:55:50 +0000 UTC]

Deliberately timely less people is far from tragic in my book
who are the biggest hazzard to the only home we have.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelJohnMorris In reply to scifilicious [2020-02-29 17:08:30 +0000 UTC]

Are you saying less people is good or bad?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

scifilicious In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2020-02-29 18:59:10 +0000 UTC]

Good, if it was up to me 4billion less, less people, less troubles, less war, less poverty & hunger, less polution, less extinction etc 
We are a plague that eradicated all our natural enemies & most diseases & we need to be contained, one way or another
& if i'm one of them, so be it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelJohnMorris In reply to scifilicious [2020-02-29 19:18:11 +0000 UTC]

You can't be serious. -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

scifilicious In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2020-03-01 00:26:48 +0000 UTC]

I am What's your solution, concrete the whole planet & continue our mindless overconsumption & road to extinction?
we extincted 70% of all diversity the past 20years, We kill millions of animals a day, destroy the lungs of the planet for profits.
bees & insects with pesticides, that we need to grow our fruit & vegetables.
It took 100.000 years to get to 2bill in 1850, it took 150years to get to 7billion, something's got to give eventually, 
We brought it on ourselves, are u willing to give up half your luxury? prob not, & neither does the rest of the western world,
& the former 3rd world, is becoming 1st world, so we're not going to deminish our carbon footprint anytime soon.

So i'm not hypocrite about it. Nature has it ways to get rid of a rash, everything in nature is yin & yang
& when something gets the upperhand it has it's ways to restore balance,
whether with a virus, a meteor or methane gasses stored in the ground & who knows what ancient virus climate change will bring.
It sounds harsh but a few billion less could be our saviour to avoid our own extinction in the long run.
& then hopefully do a green sustainable restart, that is more in harmony & containable with nature.
So i'm not some sadistical psycopath, but a long term philosopher for the greater good, that is not only centered around humans

👍: 0 ⏩: 0