Comments: 110
Aericlee [2017-03-14 16:59:06 +0000 UTC]
I want to hug her- very beautifully done! Do you mind if I draw this picture/reference it?
π: 0 β©: 1
Aericlee In reply to Theophilia [2017-03-15 04:54:34 +0000 UTC]
Oh, thank you! I really want to hug Mary in this pic though. She looks so... merciful.
π: 0 β©: 0
CaptainSmith100 [2015-09-26 06:55:42 +0000 UTC]
i thought the virgin mary was barefoot? please reply nicely...
π: 0 β©: 2
Aericlee In reply to CaptainSmith100 [2017-03-16 16:15:22 +0000 UTC]
Ha ha ha! I remember you. You commented on a picture ofΒ Porcelain-Requiem Β asking the same question.Β
A Jewish girl like Mary would've worn sandals outside her home. Within the house, she went barefoot. Mary followed Jesus, as implied in a few Bible passages, and obviously she would've worn sandals.Β
In artistic depictions, she may be shown with shod feet or barefoot depending on the artist's imagination. In depictions of the Flight Into Egypt/Stay In Egypt/Return From Egypt, she is shown with shod feet. In depictions of The Annunciation/Immaculate Conception/The Nativity, she may be shown barefoot.Β
In depictions of The Passion Of Our Lord, especially in images depicting The Stations Of The Cross/Carrying Of The Cross, Mary's feet are shod. She is shown with shod feet when depicted at the Crucifixion, or at the Ascension. Since she was with the Apostles in the cenacle, Mary is shown barefoot. Since she was buried and dead in the grave, Mary is shown barefoot.Β
People don't need clothes or sandals in heaven, so Mary as well as The Lord Jesus, angels, and saints are shown barefoot.
π: 0 β©: 0
DivineLightAngels [2013-11-05 23:10:08 +0000 UTC]
The amount of progress you made in 4 years is incredible. Keep painting, never stop, you will surely become a master. Don't leave it for later, otherwise your progress will slow down.
π: 0 β©: 1
Theophilia In reply to TarmaHartley [2013-08-19 23:52:49 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
Oh, that must be lovely! I would like to re-do this piece sometime in the near future, but who knows.
π: 0 β©: 1
Whytegriffin [2013-01-07 02:41:58 +0000 UTC]
So cool! That is one of my absolute favorite medieval statues! Nice job.
π: 0 β©: 1
japan112899 [2012-09-01 04:44:54 +0000 UTC]
Nice work. This is my third favorite Madonna iconography. First is Maesta and second is Pieta.
π: 0 β©: 1
Theophilia In reply to japan112899 [2012-09-04 01:22:34 +0000 UTC]
Oh gosh, I don't even know if I could say what my favorite iconographic style is. Hmmm...I'd have to think about it for awhile...
π: 0 β©: 1
MeadowsFiftyNine [2011-08-26 18:07:25 +0000 UTC]
... and this is even better; the Madonna of Mercy is my favorite iconography of the Blessed Mother, thank you for painting it for us!
π: 0 β©: 1
Tahnja [2010-11-06 09:32:18 +0000 UTC]
She really is gorgeous....well done!
π: 0 β©: 1
admiral-squee [2010-01-26 04:37:18 +0000 UTC]
Again, gorgeous. Keep up the good work!
π: 0 β©: 1
aru-lover [2010-01-04 23:52:22 +0000 UTC]
Quite lovely! I love how you've made her more happy looking, lol. She looks beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 1
brownieblush In reply to Theophilia [2009-09-20 02:06:54 +0000 UTC]
Ditto. Now, check this out:
[link]
This is of EQUAL VALUE to this beautiful Madonna piece.
I need to take Art Philosophy and History in college. I didn't realize how interested I was in the debate.
π: 0 β©: 1
Theophilia In reply to brownieblush [2009-09-20 17:42:31 +0000 UTC]
Hehehe, my first reaction to it was the same that I'd have to some magled up road kill.
"What is it?"
And then poke it with a stick. Like, really, what the crap is that? It's a yellow line down a brown canvas.
*Tearfully* Why do I even bother tying? My art will NEVER be as good as that!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Al-LZQ [2009-09-09 14:34:43 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful! She looks really beautiful, and realy loving at the same time!
π: 0 β©: 1
FireFiriel [2009-08-21 00:12:05 +0000 UTC]
This is so very beautiful. Her face, the color, her hair, everything! Especially her face. And these days with all the Hollywood pretty women one sees everywhere, it gets harder to find or subcreate a beautiful woman's face that's different and beautiful so as to strike awe. This does. Salve Regina!
π: 0 β©: 1
Theophilia In reply to FireFiriel [2009-09-05 18:12:38 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Heheh, well, I have a dfferent idea about beauty than Hollywood, and my model is Mary, Queen of Beauty. This is one of my favorite images of the Blessed Virgin. [link] She just looks so young and pure and innocent, (and so cute)! There are several pictures of the blessed Mother that I've seen and have ben struck by their beauty, but I can't find them all now. Anyway, in essense, my idea of a beautiful face is this: large eyes, shapely eyebrows, long thin face, small lips and a dainty nose all in proportion of course. That's for women anyway. Mary fits all those criteria. I don't really thick ginormous lips are particularly pretty. It looks like someone either got their lips stung by bees or like their puckering. Neither which I find attractive.
π: 0 β©: 1
FireFiriel In reply to Theophilia [2009-09-05 23:07:02 +0000 UTC]
Interesting, that picture has very early nineteen-twenties beauty sensibilities about it. Maybe you belong in the early twenties!
Mmm... I think many different sizes and shapes of features can be beautiful, depending. Some of the most beautiful women I've seen have big noses. (And it's not unlikely that factually historically Mary did, being Semitic. But we don't know. The Guadalupe tilma, which would be the arbiter I guess, has her with a moderate-sized nose. Of course it shows her as Aztec. But anyway, that doesn't matter; she is mother of all races.) There's an element of personal taste in there of course, which non est disputandum. (sp?) I certainly agree about the lip thing of today, especially when women get plastic surgery to enlarge them.. Ick! Big lips look good on beautiful African-descent women, though, who have them naturally. In my opinion, it's not so much a matter of a certain type of feature, it's the right type in the right combination for individual people.
And of course there's a sense in which all creatures are beautiful, ontologically.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>