Comments: 72
Wesdaaman In reply to grisador [2015-09-22 00:48:02 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, but Gastornis isn't actually a Terror Bird, it's a duck relative
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TuxedoToad In reply to Wesdaaman [2016-12-21 17:12:10 +0000 UTC]
Actually Gastornis is a Species of Terror Bird. Lets just say it was the very first species and it was possibly the ancestor to all Terror Birds. It was a carnivore that hunted Eohippus. Eohippus was a dog sized ancestor to all horses and Was the most primitive of all horses also. It also had paw-like hooves. Gastonis Was about the size of a basketball player and is had a powerful beak used to stab its prey and powerful legs used for running and for giving a fatal kick towards its prey also. Terror birds went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene and where one of the most successful bird species of all time. They were also extremely intelligent. I love studying prehistoric animals. You learn something new everyday.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to TuxedoToad [2016-12-22 02:04:56 +0000 UTC]
No, it really is an anseriform. Apparently you haven't read the up-to-date taxonomic classifications.
Also, it has been proven to be a strict herbivore.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
TuxedoToad In reply to Wesdaaman [2016-12-22 04:24:31 +0000 UTC]
The multiple books I've read and the documentaries I've watched said this animal was a species of terror bird and was a carnivore that preyed upon small herbivores such as Eohippus. Also this animal's beak is curved like that of a hook which means that it was used for tearing flesh similar to that of raptors or commonly known as birds of prey.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Wesdaaman In reply to TuxedoToad [2016-12-22 14:41:15 +0000 UTC]
It was long thought to be a gruiform, but by the late 1980s a phylogenetic analysis proved it to be an anseriform.
As for the diet, it was indeed long thought that it was either a carnivorous or omnivorous predator, ambushing smaller animals like Eohippus. But recent evidence in the late 2000s/early 2010s suggests that it was likely a true herbivore, studies of the calcium isotopes in the bones of specimens of Gastornis showed no evidence that it had meat in its diet. The geochemical analysis further revealed that its dietary habits were similar to those of both herbivorous non-avian dinosaurs and herbivorous mammals when it was compared to known fossil carnivores, such as Tyrannosaurus, leaving phorusrhacids as the only major carnivorous flightless birds.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Wesdaaman In reply to TuxedoToad [2016-12-22 14:30:21 +0000 UTC]
You need to look at modern science. Consult eartharchives.org and phenomena.nationalgeographic.com
Seriously, recent studies have shown it is a herbivorous anseriform.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TuxedoToad In reply to Wesdaaman [2016-12-22 14:48:57 +0000 UTC]
I reaserch this animal more thanks fo the Info
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wesdaaman In reply to grisador [2015-09-22 13:51:59 +0000 UTC]
....ducks already can walk and have beaks.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to grisador [2015-09-23 18:23:35 +0000 UTC]
Well, they may bear little resemblance to one another, but they are still of the same order.
Another similar phenomenon of this is Bears and Raccoons looking different but still being in the same order.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to Wesdaaman [2015-09-23 18:34:33 +0000 UTC]
True !
Wow... Rackoons & Bears ? I newly learned that !
Then bears aren't only related to canines
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to grisador [2015-09-25 21:49:47 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, Canids, Bears and Raccoons are in the order Carnivora, which also includes Felines, Mongooses, seals, Hyenas, Weasels (find out more if you'd like)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to grisador [2015-09-27 18:11:28 +0000 UTC]
What I mean is that both Caniformia and Feliformia are of Carnivora
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to Wesdaaman [2015-09-28 17:19:14 +0000 UTC]
True. But they were different genera\clade of animals who made from 'more closely' related species. Both of the genera's were relatives; yes; but they are more far related.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pappasaurus [2014-11-15 23:30:50 +0000 UTC]
Wow! Is that a Gastornis is going to hunt an anteater for dinner? I like that drawing. It looks nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to Pappasaurus [2015-09-22 00:48:32 +0000 UTC]
That's not an Anteater, that's a similar-looking Mammal called Eurotamandua
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pappasaurus In reply to Wesdaaman [2015-09-22 19:28:51 +0000 UTC]
Oh, ok, so that kinda looks like and anteater.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wesdaaman In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2015-09-22 00:48:49 +0000 UTC]
That's not an Anteater, that's a similar-looking Mammal called Eurotamandua
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hans-sniekers-art [2013-06-21 11:01:15 +0000 UTC]
This looks really if you would sit there and drew it when you watched it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Aloodonguy67 [2013-04-12 00:51:50 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Paraceratherium [2013-02-22 06:20:16 +0000 UTC]
The Phorusrhacids were distant cousins to the cranes and rails, but who was Gaston more closely related too?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Wesdaaman In reply to Paraceratherium [2015-09-22 00:56:34 +0000 UTC]
Actually, the Phorusrhacids' closest living relatives are the Seriemas
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wesdaaman In reply to Paraceratherium [2015-09-22 00:49:39 +0000 UTC]
Actually, the Phorusrhacids' closest living relative is the Seriama
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Spyrre [2010-05-11 10:30:44 +0000 UTC]
Dodo! <3
No joo, tiedän ettei ole, mutta se oli ensimmäinen ajatus ja dodot on yksi hassuimmista otuksista ikinä kiiwien ohella. Tietysti se on luultavasti vähemmän hassu heti sellaisena ihmisen kokoisena ja lihaa syövänä....
Mutta, söpö silti.
Ja muurahaiskarhu. <3
Todella mukava lyijykynätekstuuri tässä, varsinkin linnun höyhenissä.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to Spyrre [2015-09-22 00:50:32 +0000 UTC]
What Dodo?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PavelKirilovich [2009-12-04 23:40:03 +0000 UTC]
Excellent perspective in this, good "energy" to work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HellraptorStudios [2009-11-23 21:39:10 +0000 UTC]
Gastornis, a great bird, this inspier me to do more killer-birds.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator In reply to Wesdaaman [2015-09-22 12:25:02 +0000 UTC]
No, a herbivore. The isotope analysis proves that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to acepredator [2015-09-22 16:16:58 +0000 UTC]
Well, just because that study says something, it doesn't mean that it's necessarily true. Life is full of mysteries and surprises, and I for one like to think beyond what is already known.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThalassoAtrox In reply to Wesdaaman [2016-04-16 00:39:47 +0000 UTC]
Actually yes it true, an istope analisises is definitive about an animals diet. Even before the 2013 study many paleontologist assumed that Gastornis was a pure herbivore do to its lack of sharp talons and a hooked beak, and now they`ve been proven right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2016-04-16 17:32:53 +0000 UTC]
Not even any stomach contents to suggest it might have scavenged instead of hunted, as well as plant matter?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThalassoAtrox In reply to Wesdaaman [2016-04-16 18:10:32 +0000 UTC]
No,like I said the istope analisises already showed that it was purely herbivorous and isotopes don`t lie, finding stomach would only comfirm what`s already comfirmed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2016-04-17 12:03:46 +0000 UTC]
Well, I suppose that's reasonable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jdailey1991 In reply to acepredator [2015-02-03 15:47:14 +0000 UTC]
Good grief, can you give it a rest?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>