HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Armilus616
Armilus616
βοΈ
[36596104]
[2015-07-24 17:48:41 +0000 UTC]
(Switzerland)
# Statistics
Favourites: 503; Deviations: 9; Watchers: 23
Watching: 163; Pageviews: 5241; Comments Made: 801; Friends: 163
# Interests
Favorite visual artist: Luis Royo, Victoria FrancesFavorite movies: Harry Potter Series, Underworld Series, Rosemarie's Baby
Favorite TV shows: Game of Thrones, Addams Family, Doctor Who
Favorite bands / musical artists: Faun, Omnia, Nightwish, Lorena McKennit
Favorite books: Harry Potter Series
Favorite writers: JK Rowling
Favorite games: The Sims, Minecraft, C&C, Age of Mythology
Favorite gaming platform: PC
Other Interests: Occultism, Magic, Science, Storytelling, Writing, History
# Comments
Comments: 53
π: 0 β©: 0
What do you mean by that?
π: 0 β©: 1
I mean I am asking your regards.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, I am not a native English speaker...
Thank you. Had a rough night, but I'm fine.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am delighted to know your recent situation, and you don't have any problem.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am recently finished my midterm examinations. I hope it is good so that I can receive scholarship.
π: 0 β©: 1
Is it too early for congratulations?
π: 0 β©: 1
So wishing you good luck is more appropriate...
π: 0 β©: 1
You're welcome.
Tell me how it went.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank for your decision to watch my account.
π: 0 β©: 1
And thank you for watching mine
π: 0 β©: 1
My next Project is going to revolve arround the following Question:
Is it racist to portray demons as pure evil?
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay, It wasn't the next project, and it perhaps won't be the very next, but it is definitely coming.
π: 0 β©: 0
Youre Welcome.
Remembered our discussion and looked it up again.
I was quite surprised how similar our worldviews are, despite me being brought up by hippies, anarchists and communist-sympathizers.
Maybe its because my Father was also an Occultist, refered to himself as a "Brujo" (Spanish word for "Male Witch") and hated christianity too.
I found out that Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, is a jew. But you probably knew that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Technically speaking I was also raised by foolish
people who believed in multiculturalism. Thankfully
I met people who opened my eyes a very long time
ago. Growing up and being influenced by society
I gave coexistence a chance. I genuinely tried and
believed multiculturalism could work, yet, somewhere
deep inside, I knew that peoples from other races
behaved differently and would never truly integrate.
Today, the outcome of this mad policy is clear.
We must regroup, and struggle for our people's
survival.
Christianity was our former ideological barrier
against invasions, but after it lost the second world
war, its institutions were infiltrated by Jews and
Freemasons among others, who created what is
today Vatican II. This institution cannot save us
anymore. That being said we need those of our
people who wish to fight this suicidal system,
regardless of whether they are Christians or not.
We cannot permit ourselves to divide our already
few numbers. The struggle ahead is harsh and
we need all the men and women we can get.
Indeed, Mark Zuckerberg is a Jew, and he is even
suspected of gathering data on the web for
surveillance purposes. Even his name denotes
of his slave owner origins, Zuckerberg, literally
"Sugarmountain". Exploitation of natives in
Africa, possibly Oceania.
π: 0 β©: 1
I know what Zuckerberg means. I am from switzerland, remember?
German is my native language.
In fact, I was going to ask you if you understand German, because I dont know if belgians understand it and my english grammer and spelling isnt that good.
I go for google translate every now and then for complicated words.
Christianity was introduced to europe by the romans after christian jews (ethnic jews with christian belief) migrated to the italian penninsula, as it was their right as citizens of the roman empire.
First, Christianity was treated with suspicion, as they remained a small, exclusive group, and the ideology was incompatible with the roman polytheistic religion of state. Emporor Nero was the first one to persecute and execute christians for a crime many people today believe he comitted himself. Emporor Diokletian even persecuted christians in the entire empire, with the goal of exterminateing them. but it was far too common and widespread at that point.
Later, christianity beame the religion of state, and polytheists where persecuted like the christians were before. That was one of the most important reason for the fall of the roman empire. There are other, equally important reasons, but very few if any more important ones.
I still believe in coexistence. However, everyone belongs somewhere.
I would even go as far as to send all the americans of european decend back to europe, all the americans of african decend back to africa and give both the continents back to the native americans that lived there for millenia before columbus arrived there.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh yes, its true I forgot you were from Switzerland.
Your English is pretty good, and it happens from
time to time that I also use Google translate for
a few words. As far as German is concerned, let's
say I can read it if necessary using my knowledge
of Dutch, English and a few translation tools, but
overall I am not a fluid German speaker. English is
far easier for me at this time.
The Jewish issue in the Roman empire bares many
unclear facts. Apparently it was Jews through their
"agent" Poppaea, wife or Nero and Jewess, serving
as an emissary towards to Jewish communities
and those of Flavius Josephus, that they pushed
Nero to blamed the Christians for the fire of Rome.
By 64 when that happened, it was almost impossible
to distinguish a Jew from a Christian. Both called
themselves Jews at this point. Who knows exactly
what happened? I am sure that an investigation
into the chronicles (archives) could inform us about this.
Also the claim of the diaspora that the Roman empire
tried to exterminate all the Jews in its power is
absurd. Jews apparently followed the Roman legions
in every battle to collect their precious booty; slaves.
Some believe the reason why the Jews spread so
much is because of their vile trade. As Roman citizens
they were free to go wherever they wanted.
The role usury played in the downfall of the Roman
empire is not entirely certain, but it seems the
radical change by making Christianity the official
religion denotes of extreme political havoc in the
empire's spheres of influence.
Hm, as far as America is concerned, the natives
are long gone for the vast majority of time. It
makes little sense to give the land back to no one.
Many Mexican migrants demand the land as their
rightful possession for a simple reason; capitalist
consumerist societies. Except of course that if
Americans of European descent would go away,
and take all their civilization, economy with them,
strangely these Mexicans would want it anymore.
What they wish for is not the land. All they care
about is money and/or free unemployment money.
On the other side, I would say that the Boers
return to the Western world. There is no logic
for them to remain in Africa.
π: 0 β©: 2
(A bit late, but let me add that Christianity was already spread to non-jewish citizens of the roman empire during emporor diokletians rule. He wasnt persecuteing jews. He persecuted christians in order to exterminate the religion. And like I said, it was already too established and common in order to be wiped out at that point. No clue if he knew that and tried anyways or if he had no clue and thought he could wipe christianity out if he just put enough efford into it.)
π: 0 β©: 1
I suspect that Jews had gained so much power in the
Roman empire by the year 200, that Jews, like today
basically owned the ruling elites, and ordered that the
Christians be persecuted, even if Christians were already
too much wide spread and powerful.
π: 0 β©: 1
I cant verify that. I cant check if Emporor Diokletian was a Jew or if he was influenced by Jews in any way, or if he just hated christianity, or if he had diffrent reasons.
I know that the roman empire fell appart by corruption, its sheer size and the lack of methods to deliver messenges and goods quickly over long distances, and most famously: Migration.
They just couldnt cope with all the germanic tribes crossing their border trying to escape from either the huns or the mongols. Im not 100% sure wich one. Cant really tell them appart to be honest.
So, roughly what our civilisation is faceing now. And what came after was a christian dictatorship, where the pope could give or deny political power in form of a crown.
It is oversimplefied, but essentially thats what it was.
And with the church haveing absolute power over every monarch, the polytheistic religions of europe died out.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well technically speaking the Huns were Mongols,
so it makes little sense to differentiate these two
names in this context.
The Roman Empire is indeed a very good indicator
of how massive immigration is lethal to civilization
in the end. It was multicultural from the moment
they annexed other regions and needed other
people's armies to grow their own ranks.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, but you make it seem like it was, like THE ONLY reason for its downfall.
Any historyan and even history teacher can tell you that there is never an one and only reason for something on this scale.
On a scale of such size, there are always multiple factors that play into each other.
If the government wasnt crippled by corruption, the communication speed from one end of the empire to the other wasnt limited and christian values werent that widespread and legally protected, any emporor could have reacted to the migration issue and it wouldnt have affected the integrity of the empire, and once solved, the empire could easily recover.
The succes of christian erradication, the invention of a communication method that was signifficently faster than couriers on horseback and a strong emporor that successfully reforms the state so corruption ceases to exist and installs regulations so it doesnt come back and later another reasonably competent emporor to deal with the migrants could have saved the roman empire to face diffrent problems centuries later that the people in the middle ages had to face.
Today, communication speed is an issue too, but in the other way arround. Everyone can send masseges to the opposite side of the globe in seconds. And that includes bullshit stuff.
Other than that, all the problems that brought the roman empire down are also things the western civilisation suffers from.
π: 0 β©: 1
I fear that ultimately multiculturalism create too many
problems in society, leading to increased division
through logical loss of the essence of the people
who built it in the first place.
I have just uploaded to first part of Alfred Rosenberg's
"Myth of the Twentieth Century", where he briefly
explains the fall of several great civilizations through
the process of miscegenation.
The Myth - Alfred Rosenberg part 1Alfred Rosenberg - The Myth of the Twentieth Century PDF:
https://ia902700.us.archive.org/20/items/TheMythOfTheTwentiethCentury/Myth.pdf
Rosenberg's work is separated into 3 books. Other books and their correspondent
videos coming soon. The video is not a full audio narration of the book, but it
does provide enough passages to understand the doctrine that it displays.
- Book 1 discusses the great contributions of Nordic peoples to the civilizations
of the Middle-East, India and southern Europe, how blood purity was a prerequisite
to the maintenance of such durable civilizations, and how ultimately, through blood
bastardization, the essence of the founders of these civilizations faded away. It
also stresses how the moral decay brought by the Asiatic, African and Semitic
cultures poisoned the souls of Nordic peoples, and how many ancient civilizations
felt for many concepts which seemed positive like democracy, social sympathy,
universalism, or humility and love, but were in fact lethal
π: 0 β©: 1
Ill comment it when I finish reading/watching it.
In the City where I live in, they celebrated FlΓΌchtlingstag (refugee-day) today.
Market with a lot of african food, african music and other stuff.
They introduced african/arabic culture to the natives instead of showing the native culture to the refugees, while makeing those feel a bit more at home.
I told a friend that I heared about africans sending messages by drumming. So an african musician who knows how to do that could easily insult the audience and tell stuff like "die white scum, were gonna kill you all" and more things along those lines, and we would have no idea, just listen and enjoy, since to us its just music.
If someone has no clue about morse code, its just a wierd beeping noise on the radio that might as well be a technical error.
In the fictional universe I am working on, there is "Das Reich des Nordes" (the Empire/Reich of the north). It is heavily based on the nazis.
While useing a lot of nazi-based stuff, villain clichees and a red and black color palette, I do not plan on portraying them as the bad guys. They should just appear to be at first glance, and later redeemed. I even think about the protagonist decideing to live there at the end of the story, but that is something I am still far away from decideing. They accept immigrants, even wellcome them openly if they are from the same continent since there is no signifficant language barrier and the cultures automatically interact through literature and tradeing, however, if they are from diffrent continents, unlaimed or magically corrupt areas, they have a lot of opstacles installed and only accept a limited number.
They have a quickly growing population, stay roughly the same ethnically and culturally, have a strong military, economy and a very high living standart for their citizens.
Other Nations in this universe have diffrent social structures and governing systhems, such as monarchy or aristocracy (the greek definition of "rule of the best/fittest", not the modern definition that is synonymous with monarchy), while democracy is strictly forbidden. (This is because people with magical powers/the inharent abbility to learn how to preform magic are a small minority and in a democracy any hard minority that signifficantly differs from the majority is automatically and innevitably opressed by it. Magical People being opressed by non-magical people was what caused the great war of the old world in that universes backstory, where millions of people died and huge chunks of landmass became uninhabitable by humans due to magical corruption.)
Im still in the world building procces and nowhere near starting to write the story. I tell you that because I got a lot of inspiration for it from our conversations.
Modern Esotheric and Satanism both mix practices and diety warship from old paganism, christianity, bhuddism, hinduism, native americans and many more. It is not purely one or the other, no matter how the wicca movement wants you to believe its the continuation/successor of traditional european witchcraft.
They cant use the pure pagan stuff because of limited records and a lot of klowlege about rituals, legends and traditions being lost beyond recover, so they fill the gaps with whatever fits the purpose somewhat, even if it means importing plants that are native to mexico while plants that grow wild in europe are largely ignored even if they could be used the same way for the same thing.
In my oppinion, they both make very severe mistakes: One embraces the christian concept of moral values (clear line between good and evil and rejection of anything seen as evil) and the other focusses on christian dieties.
While Esotheric teachings often include angels, they also use other dieties and sometimes even invent new ones. Satanism, while rejecting christian values, focusses heavily on christian dieties and christian interpretations of non-christian dieties.
This creates the illusion that the christians where right about witchcraft all along to the outside viewer.
The satanists who openly worship the devil and are not above dooing harmfull spells and curses, and those that worship angels and rafuse to do any black magic.
I dont know very much about the other cultures inside the mix, but haveing christianity in it is severely limiting and causes damage.
π: 0 β©: 1
Honestly the satanist movement was invented by
Freemasons and composed the base of their
ideology. Modern satanism is also created by the
Jew Lavey (Levy). It is, from my own perspective,
a bastard ideology, mixing, just like Freemasonry
cultural elements from everywhere. It is, in a sense
spiritual globalism, or spiritual multiculturalism. My
instinct tells me to feel rejectful about it.
π: 0 β©: 1
I Guess your journal stuff tries to explain whats wrong with multiculturalism, but for some reason, my english is not good enough to understand those book quotes.
Like its explained in a really complicated way so I probably would have to read it several times even if it was in German or something.
Satanism is not even a unified moovement. The laveyan church of satan is just the biggest and most prominent group out there.
Neither the only one nor the oldest.
There were others before that.
Many People also seem to believe that the Thule-Gesellschaft in prewar germany was satanist too, but I never saw anything that connects it to anything related to satanism.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thule was for all practical purposed Germanic in essence.
Satanism is Jewish in essence, just like Islam, Freemasonry,
and to some extend Christianity. They are contrary to one
another.
π: 0 β©: 1
"To some extend"?
Thats like saying a french Baguette is "to some extend" a bread.
π: 0 β©: 1
To some extend because Christianity has incorporated
so many aspects of European Paganism and its values
that is can hardly be considered totally Jewish in essence.
π: 0 β©: 1
It has incorporated a lot of pagan symbols and rituals, but perverted them and poisened them.
Portraiing the old gods as demons and servants to the devil.
The christmas tree is one exemple.
We used to take a few evergreen twigs inside the house overnight, lighting candles next to it, or put it near the fireplace over winter solstice to symbolically protect the green and the life it represents from the cold long night and bring it back to where it came from afterwards, and we used to decorate a living tree with colorfull pieces of cloth outdoors, celebrateing and worshipping light and life, sometimes even lighting large bonefires.
Now we cut down those trees we used to worship and protect in the old days, and let them rot and decay in our living rooms, while we worship a himiliated, violated, mutilated, rotting corpse nailed on wooden planks.
This is not a feast of light and life anymore, nor the preservation of it. Christianity has made it into a holyday of death, and capitalism has made it into something that doesnt mean anything other than buying presents to put them under the rotting corpse of a tree.
Christmas might have been intended to emulate and incorporate yule, but it turned into its exact opposite.
That is, if you ask me, even worse than if it was still 100% jewish.
Also, there was this christian guy. He wanted to kill me for not shareing his religious views. He wasnt even the first one to use christianity to cause harm to me or my family either. He was just the worst.
The only person that I know for sure is of jewish decent within my friends and family is my godfathers wife. And believe it or not, she is a doctor that works a lot with european medical herbs, knows a lot about paganism and european mythology, is the closest thing to a celtic druid that still exists, and I trust her with my life.
When it comes to her religious believes, she is not a jew, far from it. She is of jewish decend, but thats it.
I dont know anyone else personally (as far as Im aware) of jewish decend, so I cant tell if shes a one in a million exeption, but if shes not a proove that not all jews are the same, shes at least that.
I know a woman with jewish ancestors but very pagan believes and knowlege and little to no ideological connection to jewism and I have known several christian fanatics.
See the pattern?
According to my own first hand experience, blood and ancestry is not linked to upbringing, ideology and culture.
The People wanting to harm me or my family were of diffrent ethnical origin, mostly european, but had one thing in common: Christianity, or an Ideology closely related to it.
Of course I see that immigrants and refugees bring their culture with them, and I get that incorporateing that culture could result of legal child rape. Thats something I hate.
But that is because of their culture, not their blood.
The Blood brings diffrences in skin color and facial shapes. These are caused/cause further diffrences on a biochemical level, some going as far as affecting hormone production, thus altering the activity of certain parts of the brain and therefore the behavior and emotional capacities. This does influence culture, but only over the course of hundreds of generations.
This can be as visible as an african not needing nearly as much sunscreen but relying on vitamin D from the farmacy or be as unnoticeable as the result of generations of interbreeding with europeans so the influence of non european decend is basicly invisible. (Seriously, despite me knowing how to spot a jew by facial feautures from evalions video, I wouldt be able to know if she hadnt told me)
But Culture and Idealism, Values and Morals...
Organized Child-Rape in the vatican, and the pope defending that, every now and then a priest in the news that raped little boys, all those stories from islamic countries about women beaten to death with rocks as a punishment for being raped by multiple men and men rapeing several children and getting away with it and babies dying because of infections caused by some old hag cutting of parts of their genitalia with a rusty, blunt kitchen knife...
All of that, plus more, in the name of the same one god that Jews, Christians and Muslims pray to.
Im not saying mixing blood is a good thing. It can provide useful antybodys for a large variation of deseases and boost an immune systhem, but done overexessively, it can be lethal for the group of people of signifficantly smaller numbers.
In Europe, this was for millenia the immigrant from africa or Asia. Now, with a shrinking european population and millions of refugees, it slowly shifts to be closer and even turning into the opposite, if the trend continues.
Two of several theories on how Human evolution will continue in the future:
1. Interbreeding of several races leads to all the diffrencies blurring out until only one ethnicity still exists: A Monoethnicity of people of roughly copper skin with big (probably mostly blue) eyes and dark hair.
2. People being attracted sexually to people with matching education and abilities as well as phisical characteristics (psychologically, this is a thing) results in a split of mankind into two seperate species. One being Smart, litterate, educated andΒ beautyful but physically weak and vaunurable to desease and the other being strong, tough but lack of intellect to the point where we would see them as mentally handycapped. (An extreme case of Nerds Vs Jocks)
Both theories have people who believe in them and people who think it is ridicilous and make fun of it or try to debunk it.
(The Theory that is considered the most likely by many people I asked was that mankind will either wipe itself out before any of that can happen or develops the technology to upload their brains into machines and continue their lives in mechanical bodys, leaveing their biological existence behind)
π: 0 β©: 1
People identify by two things; ideology and race.
Ideology is mortal and fades in strength, unless
supported by race. Race is the most solid and
natural mortar for any group. When groups lose
their racial homogeneity, they build ideology to
keep the peoples together who don't recognize
each other as part of the same race anymore.
Then the ideology weakens, and race comes to
dominate again, often through conflict. That is
why we should never race-mix, that is why race
is the most important factor in human societies.
π: 0 β©: 1
Can you support that claim?
It does make logical sense, but that doesnt make it true.
I know that Prejudice is a mechanism built in to our brains evolutionary in order to ensure our Survival. It helped People identify members of other tribes even without haveing seen this person ever before. It was built in so even small children would know who is one of their own and who isnt, and it was made so they would fear those who arent because diffrent tribes tended to treat each other very violently. People living in entire countries or even continents that look simmilar enough to be considered the same by our brain is a fairly recent phenomenon, 25000 years or less, and therefore evolution could not adjust to it yet.
Those wanting to accept those refugees ignore those and deny those signals. Those who notice them hate themselves for haveing them and pretend to not have them, and those who know about them regard them as once useful for our survival but now gets in the way, now that the world has changed.
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe any historical civilization can attest to
this rather universal principle. If we take the
history of the Middle-East, many civilizations
were build by Indo-European tribes. They
composed with the local, often Semitic populations.
But eventually nothing was left from these once
great places.
In a more precise example we can compare
several empires like Rome or Austria-Hungary
versus the German and Japanese empires.
Rome and Austria-Hungary are now gone
while the German and Japanese, even after
defeat, even after total annihilation and
submission, even after decades of propaganda
to hate themselves, still exist. Unsurprisingly,
what is today destroying the German empire is
racial invasion. The reason why some states
survive or not on the long run, is racial
homogeneity. Loose this property, and the
state eventually crumbles down. The people,
the very pillars of the state feeling alien to
one another eventually struggle against
each other, effectively breaking down the
foundations of that state.
Even the Middle-East eventually stabilized
when it became more or less Semitic in racial
composition. A Semitic ideology then came
into existence to solidify the few racial
differences in the region; Islam. We can
even analyze Islam a bit more. Islam is
divided among essentially Sunni and Shia.
These can be observed through the racial
lens with decent accuracy. The Shia
populations, mainly Iranians, are considered
"Persians" by the Sunni. This is most interesting
indeed. If we take Christianity it also follows
more or less racial patterns. The Protestant
countries are essentially Nordic countries,
Roman Catholic essentially the old Latin
world, which shares some racial similarities,
and the Orthodox world comprising essentially
the Slavic and Greek world. Judaism, is mainly
divided in Ashkenazi, "European Jews", that is
European half-breeds, and the Sephardi Jews,
either not mixed or mixed with other Semites,
Berbers, etc.
Ideology is merely more than a racially driven
phenomenon. A global observation of history
and geography seems to support this notion.
Sorry for the long post.
π: 0 β©: 1
I dont have a counter argument for it. I will need some time to work with this information, verifying it and working it in my worldview.
But I hope you understand that I wont just believe it like that just because I cant argue against it, being told that race doesnt matter my entire life. Thats not something that dissappears over night.
I can tell you that it feels akward interacting with people of a diffrent race. I denied that for, like, the entirety of my life. A few months, maybe a year ago, I found out that this is because of a survival mechanism in my brain that is inharently built in by evolution in order to protect me from threats makind was constantly faceing over the course of over 2 million years, but now doesnt exist anymore according to modern media. Now you tell me that listening to this feeling still makes sense even today.
Knowing about this function of the brain felt releaveing. I could aknowlege that the feeling is there without feeling guilty.
I would like to ask you if you know a place where I could listen to a speach of hitler?
Not short passages of his speaches or quotes, full speaches. I wanted to do that for years now, just out of curiosity.
I dont need them to be translated or subbed. I actually never saw a english translation of any of his quote that did him justice.
But since I do speak german natively, I dont need that anyway.
π: 0 β©: 1
And it is right to question what you are being told.
One should never accept any such important
statements blindly. That is probably a sign of
genuine critical thinking. A rare gift these days.
The media today assures us that our world will
remain the same throughout this immigration
process. Considering non-Europeans being a
majority in Europe, and ultimately having third
world people decide our white destiny for us,
I can hardly believe that this situation will be
safe for us. I grew up as a white minority during
school. I think I understand what the future
holds in store for us and future generations.
Yes I do have 2 very good sources for Hitler
and other members of the NSDAP's speeches:
- This entire YouTube channel:
www.youtube.com/channel/UCJrUbβ¦
- This archived collection of speeches:
archive.org/details/Hitler_Speβ¦
We have also managed to reconstitute Hitler's
first speech as chancellor:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zo0kdβ¦
There was also an incomplete, yet interesting
compilation of Hitler speeches with video here:
Hitler: The Ultimate Collection of Speeches - 2HEDIT: a 3 hours version of the same video is now available:
2 Hours of Adolf Hitler speeches with no music and with subtitles where possible.
This is far from being complete since most speeches last 1h on average, yet this
is an amazing collection of must see, must know speeches.
Let's all be patient for the day we will have all of these archive material in color
and remastered. In the meantime let's enjoy, what we possess.
Note: An almost complete version of Hitler's first speech as chancellor is about
to be released in the future by devoted comrades.
Hail Victory,
Der Himmelstern
The 300 Spartans - Hermann Goring by Der-Himmelstern
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair us
Many of these speeches require understanding
of the contemporary situation, references, and
even names to be fully understood, but I think
you should not have too hard to understand.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you.
I managed to download some of the you tube videos with full lengh speaches (I believe) and a 1 hour 44 minute version of "Triumph des Willens".
π: 0 β©: 0
Never said it was practical or easy, not even that it was possible.
Just that I belive its their land and should belong to them. You can disagree with me here.
What I was suggesting is give them the space to recover, like they couldnt in centuries. By getting the intruders where they belong.
That could be done on any other continent. You suggested that, right?
Also, what you told me on our earlier conversation inspired me to a yet unfinished countryballs comic.
(Well, Unfinished is a loose word. With a bit of imagination, it could be seen as finished. It has sort of 3 endings.)
π: 0 β©: 1
Technically they already have their land since there are
no more Indians in North America except for Mexico.
We can hardly deport about 1/3 of our race's population
to give it to peoples who don't need it. Moreover it is
disputed who was first in America, Asiatics, or whites.
The living space of our people is Europe, a few places
in the steppes, the top norther part of America and
Australia. As it is actually, the white race, the American
Indian race, the Africans, and the mongoloid races all
have fairly similar living spaces in terms of size.
What was our earlier conversation about? I don't quiet
remember accurately. I have seen the country ball about
Germany, true, but sad.
π: 0 β©: 1
About how immigrants replace culture. Among other things. (It wasnt that recently. I just didnt have a better word)
Second Part will be a set of fiction where something happens to germany to make it not recognizeable.
There are 3 endings to the whole story, like I said, and one of them involves germany becomeing the islamic state of germanistan.
You can decide for yourself wich one you want to be the canonical one.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ironically, if migrants convert us to Islam, we will
only fight them even more as religious unity
quickly falls apart due to a much stronger factor;
race. The major difference will be that we too
will kill the infidels wherever we find them, and
that will clearly target Semitic peoples in the end.
Ironically, they do not realize that if they manage
to convert us, they are doomed.
π: 0 β©: 1
How are they doomed if they destroy western civilisation?
Anyway, I think you will like the second ending...
π: 0 β©: 1
What might the second ending be?
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>