HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Mathmonkey
# Statistics
Favourites: 290; Deviations: 134; Watchers: 25
Watching: 57; Pageviews: 9304; Comments Made: 3846; Friends: 57
# About me
Well, I like a variety of arts, but mostly not drawing, so it's a bit hard for me to really show my work on here. I sew, bead in a variety of ways, and make duct tape creations. I'm always looking for new projects and ways of doing different designs, especially for duct tape. I try to draw, sometimes, but I'm not very good and I've never taken any art classes. I'm trying to develop my own style, but it's challenging. I stick to construction and what I know usually though.# Comments
Comments: 569
iKenojo [2013-08-24 15:51:30 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the fave of Dragon II !
It was very appreciated !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to iKenojo [2013-08-25 00:06:28 +0000 UTC]
No problem. Good origami should never go unnoticed ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
squeebler [2012-02-15 02:17:40 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2012-01-18 21:04:12 +0000 UTC]
That was really good. Every time I hear that song now I'm going to think of those scenes. Oh my.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2012-01-19 01:39:36 +0000 UTC]
WHYYYYYYYYYY.
Also, Moffat confirmed there was an OOC moment in Reichenbach, so your key code theory may hold out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2012-01-19 06:36:06 +0000 UTC]
HA! Thought so. The key code was such obvious BS though. Suspending a disbelief is too hard for such a ridiculous plot hole. I'm sure Sherlock will reveal he was playing along the whole time or something amazing next series.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2012-01-26 06:27:39 +0000 UTC]
Ohh, I like this one too. Still though, I'm much more Sherlock/John (Shohn? Jerlock?) than Shermolly (?)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2012-01-20 01:58:36 +0000 UTC]
Sorry to change the subject, but did you hear about SOPA and PIPA? Megaupload's already been closed down and the employers arrested.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2012-01-20 05:59:33 +0000 UTC]
nice subject change. Yeah, I have. I live on the interwebs. Perhaps differently than you, but I still hear what is going on in the blogosphere! Hopefully PIPA will not pass! That would be an awful violation of rights. I would take it to the supreme court if it passed to get it overturned, if Obama doesn't veto it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-27 05:14:24 +0000 UTC]
HELL FUCKING YES. Twas only a matter of time
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-27 05:26:46 +0000 UTC]
Does that make her Mycroft? Or Lestrade?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-27 05:43:43 +0000 UTC]
...hmmmm. I'd say Mycroft, since she came in later than when we met Lestrade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-27 16:55:33 +0000 UTC]
Wait, if we were going by when people were introduced, I'd be John, you'd be Sherlock, Angel would be Mycroft, and Abbi would be Moriarty, or something to that effect, so I don't think the matter of "when" should be taken into consideration, considering I'm Moriarty, and I was the first to get into it, and Jim isn't introduced until WAY later, and you're John, even though you were second.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-27 17:01:22 +0000 UTC]
hmmmmm. Well we could still say Abbi is moriarty because early on she played gay but now it's not quite as obvious and it's also in dispute XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-27 17:20:36 +0000 UTC]
No. I am Moriarty. Don't give her roles that are taken. *angry face*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-28 03:00:03 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm.... Maybe Sarah? Or Molly?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-28 04:56:31 +0000 UTC]
hmmm. I'd say Sarah. Molly is too weak.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-28 05:16:15 +0000 UTC]
Actually, she's getting character development in series two. And that means you're dating Abbi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-28 05:30:31 +0000 UTC]
Ooh, sweet! And whatevvvs, it's all fictitious anyway!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-28 06:18:04 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-16 01:29:00 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zen666 [2011-12-08 19:53:15 +0000 UTC]
IT'S COMING OUT JANUARY FIRST AT 8:10 PM HOLY SHIT AND IT GOT GOOD REVIEWSSSSS
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-08 20:41:46 +0000 UTC]
OH MY GOD (I read the other thing too, so this works for that too)!!!!!!!!!! I CANNOT WAIT! How will I be able to see it though? When would it get online???
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zen666 In reply to Mathmonkey [2011-12-08 21:29:41 +0000 UTC]
Hm, try January 2nd. OMG. OMG. THAT'S VACATION. THAT'S IT. WE'RE HAVING A SLEEPOVER ON THE FIRST AND WATCHING IT THE NEXT MORNING. YOU CAN'T WATCH IT WITHOUT ME.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mathmonkey In reply to zen666 [2011-12-09 02:21:15 +0000 UTC]
HOLY CRAP HELL YES! <3 OF COURSE! Is it really vacation? It's a saturday isn't it. That makes sense. How will we be able to see it the next day??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>