Comments: 16
philippeL [2014-07-23 01:18:21 +0000 UTC]
OMG love the idea!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jennifer-Adams [2014-06-24 01:53:05 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
enigmaticworld In reply to Carbon-Vanilla [2014-06-26 19:09:55 +0000 UTC]
So, given how big the distances between stars are, you honestly think their engines would work on a burning reactions?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Carbon-Vanilla In reply to enigmaticworld [2014-06-26 21:41:08 +0000 UTC]
I don't know, it's concept art.. this isn't even real and I'm not gonna waste time thinking about probabilities or the possibilities of some make believe alien race with technology that is barely understood. Yes, it is possible to turn seawater into fuel but that discovery was recently found and the process for making that fuel is inefficient at the moment. Honestly I don't care, I was simply sharing a thought; that's it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kova031 In reply to Carbon-Vanilla [2014-06-26 15:54:57 +0000 UTC]
I have a friend whose sister claims she saw a car that runs on water (though it isn't the drinkable kind) , that she even saw it being tanked. It was in Norway or some place, her friend worked for a company that had a prototype.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Carbon-Vanilla In reply to Kova031 [2014-06-26 16:22:33 +0000 UTC]
You do know hydrogen isn't toxic, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kova031 In reply to Carbon-Vanilla [2014-06-26 16:41:07 +0000 UTC]
I don't know why it isn't drinkable....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Carbon-Vanilla In reply to Kova031 [2014-06-26 16:46:27 +0000 UTC]
unless it's not pure hydrogen yeah... it could be toxic. It depends where the water source came from, if there are chemicals present within the water it could cause problems for someone or the machine in question. Distilled Water is the best source though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dustycrosley In reply to Carbon-Vanilla [2014-06-27 01:08:24 +0000 UTC]
I am arriving late to this conversation.....and this is my kind of convo. Yeah the claims that the U.S. Navy can convert seawater into fuel are a bit overstated the further I have read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Carbon-Vanilla In reply to dustycrosley [2014-06-27 06:54:13 +0000 UTC]
A bit? I think it's outrageous for the fact that they need a nuclear power plant solely for the purpose of powering their system for retrieving the CO2 and Hydrogen gasses and converting them into hydrocarbons for processing into viable fuel. Also to grasp the idea of how much a military jet burns fuel, that's like having 44 cars idling altogether. To be honest using this new discovery wont save the human race, basically we'd be taking the CO2 from the oceans, converting it into fuel and then throwing it back into the ocean and with the continued use of industrial machinery the problem won't go away, it'll only continue to get worse. The solution is to stop using crude oil as a fuel source, the main issue is introducing and teaching people to a new standard like hydrogen or electric vehicles. It's not hard for the younger folks (ages 40 and below) it's the older generations that are struggling to keep up or understand the new changes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IronXZ In reply to Mechatherium [2014-06-27 17:34:05 +0000 UTC]
That was exactly what i thought when i saw this picture, oceans are one of the best sources of fusion fuel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CutieTurret [2014-06-24 00:55:14 +0000 UTC]
This looks awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0