HOME | DD

lisa-im-laerm — AGAIN

#atheism #atheist #atheistic #religion #weakens #sudiy
Published: 2016-01-11 11:15:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 984; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Thinking Weakens Religious Faith, Study Shows

Study finds that rational analytical thinking weakens religious belief. (That may be why rational analytical thinking appears to be so rare in religious movements, and why it is rarely stressed or taught by religious leaders.)
failedmessiah.typepad.com/fail…




In my new study of 137 countries, I also found that atheism increases for countries with a well-developed welfare state (as indexed by high taxation rates). Moreover, countries with a more equal distribution of income had more atheists. My study improved on earlier research by taking account of whether a country is mostly Muslim (where atheism is criminalized) or formerly Communist (where religion was suppressed) and accounted for three-quarters of country differences in atheism.

In addition to being the opium of the people (as Karl Marx contemptuously phrased it), religion may also promote fertility, particularly by promoting marriage (3). Large families are preferred in agricultural countries as a source of free labor. In developed countries, by contrast, women have exceptionally small families. I found that atheism was lower in countries where a lot of people worked on the land.

Even the psychological functions of religion face stiff competition today. In modern societies, when people experience psychological difficulties they turn to their doctor, psychologist or psychiatrist. They want a scientific fix and prefer the real chemical medicines dished out by physicians to the metaphorical opiates offered by religion. No wonder that atheism increases along with third-level educational enrollment (1).

The reasons that churches lose ground in developed countries can be summarized in market terms. First, with better science, and with government safety nets and smaller families, there is less fear and uncertainty in people's daily lives and hence less of a market for religion. At the same time many alternative products are being offered, such as psychotropic medicines and electronic entertainment that have fewer strings attached and that do not require slavish conformity to unscientific beliefs.

www.huffingtonpost.com/nigel-b…



 
Related content
Comments: 43

VikingFox [2017-03-15 02:59:14 +0000 UTC]

Dogs frequently break logic, but not in that sense XD

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Briannabater [2016-01-20 03:34:10 +0000 UTC]

Funny stuff.  And sad...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Briannabater [2016-01-20 15:08:20 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that's true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Skyhornet [2016-01-14 02:26:10 +0000 UTC]

LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Skyhornet [2016-01-14 16:32:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katiejo911 [2016-01-11 22:43:36 +0000 UTC]

Dead dogs can be brought back by cloning. BAM!  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to katiejo911 [2016-01-12 16:25:39 +0000 UTC]

Didn´ t came to that idea, but yeahhh!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katiejo911 [2016-01-11 22:43:07 +0000 UTC]

Interesting statistics.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to katiejo911 [2016-01-12 16:26:00 +0000 UTC]

   

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cataclyptic [2016-01-11 20:00:18 +0000 UTC]

Ah, critical thinking, the greatest enemy of faith. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Cataclyptic [2016-01-12 16:33:30 +0000 UTC]

truth

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShadowofWOPR [2016-01-11 18:19:30 +0000 UTC]

As a wise slug once said in regards to selective breeding...
vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/h…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to ShadowofWOPR [2016-01-12 16:34:52 +0000 UTC]

can´ t listen to it, buddy. Sorry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowofWOPR In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-13 00:03:42 +0000 UTC]

"If evolution product of design, is evolution...  evolution?  Hmm...  Line of thought not productive."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to ShadowofWOPR [2016-01-13 17:19:01 +0000 UTC]

evolution has no plan, like design has. It is more a trying, getting forward by failing also, I would say. Design don't ballows failures, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowofWOPR In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-14 00:32:02 +0000 UTC]

Again the context was regarding eugenics.

Design allows failures if it's part of the design

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to ShadowofWOPR [2016-01-14 16:29:25 +0000 UTC]

Isn't it, that failures make the design incomplete? When it is so, than the creation is a mistake, partly, at least
Can a god make mistakes, at all? Hasn't a creation from a perfect enity has to be perfect from beginning to the end, too?
Questions...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowofWOPR In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-14 19:19:24 +0000 UTC]

idk, I consider the english bulldog a complete design failure that shouldn't exist, other people think is perfect-ly cute.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to ShadowofWOPR [2016-01-15 16:45:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shadow-Arcanist [2016-01-11 14:10:11 +0000 UTC]

b-buddy, mr.reply dude

dead dogs can't breed

evo- EVOLUTION DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT

I AM FRUSTRATED WITH PEOPLE LIKE THAT

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Shadow-Arcanist [2016-01-12 16:32:31 +0000 UTC]

yep, they really can do that, frustrating

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MiltonTeruel [2016-01-11 13:56:13 +0000 UTC]

The thing is, if one species would give birth to a new species... that would invalidate evolutionary theory and force biologists to go back to square one.  The fact that new species do not suddenly appear fully formed is exactly what the theory of evolution predicts!

A lot of the "gotchas" from creationists are things that --if they actually happened-- would prove the theory wrong.  In other words, the very things that they claim "disprove evolution" are in fact the things that the theory predicts... and these things validate the theory!  Their "gotchas" are things that support the theory.  If we ever found such a thing as a "crockoduck" in the fossil record, that would be very strong evidence for... creation!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to MiltonTeruel [2016-01-12 16:31:36 +0000 UTC]

and a dog that dies, doesn´ t prove that evolution is wrong It simply is death His offspring will be a part of the evolution, like the dog was a part of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

offermoord [2016-01-11 13:11:07 +0000 UTC]

www.nyasatimes.com/2016/01/11/…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to offermoord [2016-01-12 16:28:29 +0000 UTC]

rain

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

leothefox [2016-01-11 11:48:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh man! That guy just busted the shit out of atheism, with his... logic? There's another Kirk Cameron follower for you  

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Quick-5 In reply to leothefox [2016-01-13 17:07:40 +0000 UTC]

Do not mention the bastion of idiocy in civilized company.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to Quick-5 [2016-01-13 19:29:21 +0000 UTC]

I will try  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-11 12:03:27 +0000 UTC]

I asked myself, what I would answer to that last comment! Answering not at all, seems to be the best ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-11 12:14:50 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, a comment like that doesn't need a reply.
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-11 12:15:55 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-12 08:18:18 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-12 16:23:17 +0000 UTC]

   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-12 16:55:14 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-12 17:20:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-12 17:21:36 +0000 UTC]

     

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-12 18:34:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-13 07:40:05 +0000 UTC]

         

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-13 17:03:31 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

leothefox In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2016-01-13 19:38:32 +0000 UTC]

     

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to leothefox [2016-01-14 16:32:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheRPMKid [2016-01-11 11:43:16 +0000 UTC]

Obviously these people weren't using their brains.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to TheRPMKid [2016-01-11 11:47:16 +0000 UTC]

yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0