HOME | DD

terryt68 In reply to lady-erzsebet [2006-07-25 03:21:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

I love that era of Hollywood. Make sure you check out the original image as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lady-erzsebet In reply to terryt68 [2006-07-25 13:36:58 +0000 UTC]

you´re welcome.
Oh yes... I saw the original, it is a perfect manipulation!!!



*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to savianty [2006-02-25 17:13:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, and yes it is.

I only manipped it some, please see the original image too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

savianty In reply to terryt68 [2006-02-25 20:50:29 +0000 UTC]

I saw it, Beautiful shot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to hippypixie [2006-01-15 08:48:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

The original was a DD and stock. I just saw it as a BW image so I worked a little on it. That era has never been matched for glamour.

I like your tagline. Here's a quote from a gal from that era you might like. "It's the good girls who keep diaries; the bad girls never have the time." Tallulah Bankhead

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hippypixie In reply to terryt68 [2006-01-15 14:16:55 +0000 UTC]

Lol perfect!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to DistortedSmile [2006-01-04 18:30:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much.

I really thought this image was awesome when I saw it, and it won a DD, the original. But I felt it needed BW and the older look to it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to lady-atropos [2005-12-28 04:55:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much doll.

I would love to shoot you like that sometime, now that would be rad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to kayceeus [2005-12-26 09:07:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much.

Sometimes I look at something and just see it a certain way. This time it was a stock image and I could actually change it the way I saw it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to Euric [2005-12-25 18:48:53 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, but I cannot take credit for the whole idea or model or the main lighting.

PLEASE read above about the original. This is a photomanipulation of this incredible image [link] from this incredible artist

She created the image. I just turned it to BW and aged it with PS and a little cropping.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to photographoc [2005-12-25 18:58:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much.

Definitely wanted that era to show. I was also thinking of Lillian Gish when doing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photographoc In reply to terryt68 [2005-12-25 22:47:25 +0000 UTC]

yeah lilian gish fits even better the very young one i was thinking bout her too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to K-design [2005-12-25 00:56:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much.

I love that era of photography and Hollywood. Such style and beauty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

K-design In reply to terryt68 [2005-12-25 03:04:28 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. Class

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to killerfairy [2005-12-25 00:43:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you doll.

It is just so remanescent of the silent era of Hollywood that it needed BW. But then as you know of me, I almost feel the whole world should be in BW.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to Shade777 [2005-12-25 00:46:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment.

I am so glad you liked the manipulation. I was worried that you wouldn't. The original is so perfect that I almost did not want to touch it, but I love it in BW.

Thank you for such great art and allowing others to use it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to darkmoonphoto [2005-12-24 19:36:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

Make sure you look at the original too, it's beautiful. Linked above.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkmoonphoto In reply to terryt68 [2005-12-24 19:47:45 +0000 UTC]

To me the art of today is taking a picture and turn it into an "ART" image. That requires insight into what the models emotion is and add emotion from the photographer. In the darkroom. (Computer). Then and only then does the image become greater then the model or the photographer. I see the two of you in this image.

Rikk......

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

terryt68 In reply to darkmoonphoto [2005-12-24 20:06:21 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for a great comment.

I am kinda torn with that though. I have been in photography for over 20 years and just this year started to shoot digital. I always shot BW film and I always shot the image I wanted when the photo was taken. But now I am seeing the possibilities of the digital world.

I agree that you can take an image and then create the feel or emotion you wanted with PS but was unable to get it when the exposure was made, and as you said, it then becomes greater than it's parts. I'm just not completely sure of this, being an old film photographer. I am slowly manipulating images beyond what it was that I shot, but I really want to remain true to the moment of the the exposure or creation. However, the digital possibilites are so vast that one can take an exposure and create a true work of art now, beyond just a photograph, as you stated, and this opens up an entirely new world of art, especially for photogs like me who can't draw a stick man well.

But I feel that photomanipulation with PS is so awesome and limitless that it can't be completely ignored anymore.

I really loved the original of this image, but I really wanted to see it in BW so I was glad that the artist made it stock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

terryt68 In reply to tozer [2005-12-24 19:36:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much.

Original linked above.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0