Comments: 89
HOVONNES [2022-01-05 16:19:07 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Baron-von-Blau [2019-05-24 20:37:27 +0000 UTC]
I've commented here before, but I now have another question for you. Would you be willing to allow me to feature this icon in an episode of my Youtube Review Series? Specifically, the context for this particular episode is in looking at the Christian symbolism in Disney's Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, and in this specific segment of it, looking at the Marian symbolism in it. I would of course credit you in the credits section of my video.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Theophilia In reply to Baron-von-Blau [2019-07-06 20:21:33 +0000 UTC]
Sorry my reply is so late, I didn't see it until now.
If you haven't made the video yet, I'd be totally fine with you using the image as long as you credit me. Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baron-von-Blau In reply to Theophilia [2019-07-08 16:27:29 +0000 UTC]
I haven't uploaded the video yet, no; I'm still in the process of editing. Thank you very much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Theophilia In reply to Panzertruppe [2018-12-24 17:57:40 +0000 UTC]
I don't sell prints through deviantART, but you can find print ordering information here: Advent 2018 (towards the bottom).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Vihawk [2016-12-18 04:05:40 +0000 UTC]
OMG!!!!! God bless you man!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheDoctorIzIn [2016-11-20 14:05:13 +0000 UTC]
This is my favourite icon of the Blessed Virgin Mary. I'm currently saving up to buy large icon prints of your work by the way, just to give you an update.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baron-von-Blau [2016-10-15 00:22:01 +0000 UTC]
Truly beautiful. I love how you used stars in the globus cruciger to symbolize the universe and not just the Earth, for Christ truly is sovereign over the whole of creation. I know you probably get asked this a lot, but are any of your works available as prints?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlackPollo [2014-05-08 23:37:31 +0000 UTC]
Awesome art. Food for my soul.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grubbeolof [2014-02-02 11:22:32 +0000 UTC]
i am not sure if i like the concept of this modern style ikon. but i think it looks nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grubbeolof In reply to Theophilia [2014-02-03 21:32:41 +0000 UTC]
yes please. that sounds interesting. please do.
Lord have Mercy upon us.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Theophilia In reply to grubbeolof [2014-02-08 20:26:03 +0000 UTC]
I think G.K. Chesterton (in his book on St. Thomas Aquinas) describes it very aptly:
First, it must be remembered that the Greek influence continued to flow from the Greek Empire; or at least from the centre of the Roman Empire which was in the Greek city of Byzantium, and no longer in Rome. That influence was Byzantine in every good and bad sense; like Byzantine art, it was severe and mathematical and a little terrible; like Byzantine etiquette, it was Oriental and faintly decadent. We owe to the learning of Mr. Christopher Dawson much enlightenment upon the way in which Byzantium slowly stiffened into a sort of Asiatic theocracy, more like that which served the Sacred Emperor in China. But even the unlearned can see the difference, in the way in which Eastern Christianity flattened everything, as it flattened the faces of the images into icons. It became a thing of patterns rather than pictures; and it made definite and destructive war upon statues. Thus we see, strangely enough, that the East was the land of the Cross and the West was the land of the Crucifix. The Greeks were being dehumanised by a radiant symbol, while the Goths were being humanised by an instrument of torture. Only the West made realistic pictures of the greatest of all the tales out of the East. Hence the Greek element in Christian theology tended more and more to be a sort of dried up Platonism; a thing of diagrams and abstractions; to the last indeed noble abstractions, but not sufficiently touched by that great thing that is by definition almost the opposite of abstraction: Incarnation. Their Logos was the Word; but not the Word made Flesh. In a thousand very subtle ways, often escaping doctrinal definition, this spirit spread over the world of Christendom from the place where the Sacred Emperor sat under his golden mosaics; and the flat pavement of the Roman Empire was at last a sort of smooth pathway for Mahomet. For Islam was the ultimate fulfilment of the Iconoclasts. Long before that, however, there was this tendency to make the Cross merely decorative like the Crescent; to make it a pattern like the Greek key or the Wheel of Buddha. But there is something passive about such a world of patterns, and the Greek Key does not open any door, while the Wheel of Buddha always moves round and never moves on.
To try and put it plainly and simply, I think most traditional icons don't do what they are supposed to do. Icons are meant to be a window into heaven. When the iconoclast controversy erupted in the East it was because the people destoying icons said that people could not depict God, because God is a spirit. The orthodox (and I use small "o" to indicate not just the Eastern Orthodox, but all Christians holding to orthodox and true teachings about Christianity) view was that we could depict Christ because of the Incarnation. God actually really DID become a man, and so we could depict him materially. The problem with most icons, I think, is that they reduce Christ and the saints and angels to mere abstractions. Highly symbolic and oftentimes very beautiful abstractions, but abstractions nonetheless. As Chesterton says, they become, in a sense, "anti-incarnational."
I think that's a real problem. I like the symbolism of the colors and postures and clothing--and I think that that is absolutely beautiful. However, a lot of icons are very, very ugly, especially the faces. Like, creepy ugly. So much so that I find it incredibly distracting. As an artist interested in sacred art, I want to find a happy medium between the rigid, stern, highly symbolic and colorful icons, and the banal, insipid, over-sentimental (and maybe occasionally "over-realistic") religious art. A medium between this (chrisbashaw.files.wordpress.co… and this (img0.etsystatic.com/011/0/5201… . I believe there is medium between that. I think you can have something profoundly theological and symbolic, as well as realistic, beautiful, high, and solemn. Something like: uploads7.wikipaintings.org/ima… and uploads7.wikipaintings.org/ima… and uploads5.wikipaintings.org/ima… and uploads6.wikipaintings.org/ima… and cdn2.brooklynmuseum.org/images… .
I hope that gives you some idea of how I approach art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KanchanMahon [2013-10-18 01:38:29 +0000 UTC]
So lovely!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
haius [2013-09-27 20:06:08 +0000 UTC]
THESE JUST GET PRETTIER AND PRETTIER
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
groenny [2013-06-27 07:45:55 +0000 UTC]
Oh Santa Maria. That's Amazing drawing. I m trying to draw that in colour, because my cowardliness, i created in Black and White.
[link]
A few question. what material or colouring r u using in traditionally ? especially the gold colour.
God Bless You
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ElizabethZS [2013-06-09 20:37:32 +0000 UTC]
Ah! You capture the mysticism so well. Always love your accompanying histories and prayers. You feed us well with your art! THANK YOU!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Theophilia In reply to ElizabethZS [2013-06-12 20:04:04 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! You are too kind!! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Theophilia In reply to Ithelda [2013-04-01 20:11:01 +0000 UTC]
THANK YOU!!! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lord-Kothless [2013-02-17 03:32:44 +0000 UTC]
Your work looks like ancient Byzantine chapel ceilings, I love these.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Clarsie387 [2013-02-12 19:50:13 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely amazing! The detail on the clothing is breathtaking, gorgeous art work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sullobog [2013-02-07 15:52:27 +0000 UTC]
when I look up Theotokos on deviant art, your pictures are the first three on the list
you do amazing work, God bless you always
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dashinvaine [2013-01-31 01:36:15 +0000 UTC]
Nicely done, although baby Jesus has middle-aged Napoleon's hair.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nadyia-Drymer [2013-01-28 22:49:29 +0000 UTC]
It is beautiful, all the icon' symbolism is wonderful. Great drawing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artelizdesouza [2013-01-27 19:55:46 +0000 UTC]
Stunning. Gourgeous. Beautiful. God Bless!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mahira-MCAquila [2013-01-27 18:15:42 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic; I especially love the way you chose to shade the white clothing. It's easy to make it too dark, nor not shaded enough, or to make it look dirty. You avoided all three, and instead it looks very soft and smooth, much more natural. Good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>