guillaume-dauphin [2009-04-15 12:31:19 +0000 UTC]
hey there this pic is not a macro[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theprodigalnaysayer In reply to guillaume-dauphin [2009-04-15 12:49:20 +0000 UTC]
oh..my apologies, let me change the category..thanks for the link and the correction..is it correct to consider this photo having depth of field?
guillaume-dauphin In reply to theprodigalnaysayer [2009-04-15 13:01:54 +0000 UTC]
No problem at all! Technically all photos have a certain depth of field, I'm not sure to understand what you mean.As for the category it all depends what you think the focus is on, I would have put this picture in "emotive portrait" because of the way you put the girl far in the background, and focusing on an "insignificant" object.I read it as the insignificance of a human being, but that's my vision interesting shot anyway !
theprodigalnaysayer In reply to guillaume-dauphin [2009-04-15 13:26:48 +0000 UTC]
i like the way you think. to recall, it's more on how we turn our backs and what's left behind. i was at the beach. nature, humans, usage, neglect, global warming sort of thing. thank you for your insights.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0